That’s a very interesting set of stats. And I’d bet the past ten years would show an even greater number of fatal attacks by the breeds preferred by drug dealers and general thugs and low lifes.
Just as important would be a list of attacks causing serious, but not fatal injuries. There would probably be many more of those since many managed to escape the attacking dogs, or are helped by someone.
And I guess some insurance companies are already refusing to offer liability coverage to owners of some breeds.
Having to have high dollar insurance with some breeds would solve some of the problems....If the dog badly mauls anybody you lose your home to the victim and pay all medical bills. People would be a lot more careful with dangerous dogs if that was the case...A little jail time might also help....