Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Abathar

Yes. God Lord not guilty. Not in the beauty department anyway but she was guilty of sexual molestation.


35 posted on 09/11/2010 1:07:29 PM PDT by jmacusa (Two wrongs don't make a right. But they can make it interesting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: jmacusa

The thing about her was she got a reduced sentence because she was so pretty, the judge felt she would have a hard time in prison and let her off light. Not a person here didn’t think that was ridiculous so that started the whole “guilty, not guilty” thing about their looks when more and more stories came out about women teachers.

There are some who think there should be different punishments whether it was a woman or a man and how old the kid was. Many a poster has been flamed by others when they try and explain why there should be different standard.


38 posted on 09/11/2010 1:25:44 PM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson