Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Darnright
Please... I thought you above this sort of thing.

We were doing so well...

OK. It is one thing, for me, trying to be nice, to ignore a dozen total changes in the topic.

This one you won't get my smile.

You know damned well he has not advocated for the TORTURE of Animals. That is an absolutely baseless assault on dignity.

Nor have I. Nor has ANYONE.

I defy you to produce a post where such has been directly offered as a course of desired action.



You absolutely know what you are doing. And based on our exchanges are highly intelligent, so WHY post this? WHY?

Why set up a strawman that does not exist just to harass a FReeper?

Jollies? You people "getting" something out of this? I hope to hang around just long enough to learn what it is, then ERADICATE it.
545 posted on 09/11/2010 5:57:11 PM PDT by RachelFaith (2010 is going to be a 100 seat Tsunami - Welcome to "The Hunt for Red November".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 541 | View Replies ]


To: RachelFaith

Posting family pics now?

Your mom is going to be mad!

Note, everyone is reading the posts that you are trying to ignore and know that you are doing so because you cannot address them. No one thinks you are trying to ignore an individual but do know that you are carrying an unloaded gun. Your armory as meager as it was when you started with your nonsense is now empty.

Why don’t you address post# 445 or do us all a favor and shut the hell up?


552 posted on 09/11/2010 6:13:47 PM PDT by Eaker (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies ]

To: RachelFaith

Rachel. I did not suggest FOG has advocated torturing animals. Talk about strawmen. Let’s look at what I said. I said that studies show serial killers, not FOG, start out with the torture AND killing of animals before they ever kill their first human.

You stated that killing people was way and above killing dogs. While I agree totally, I also know that those who kill animals without reason (for food, clothing, to protect themselves and so forth) are more likely to move on to the murder of human beings.

Now as for our friend FOG, he has called for the destruction of dogs for no reason other than he dislikes a certain type. Doesn’t matter if that individual animal is a vicious monster or if it’s the gentle companion seen on the Little Rascals series. Doesn’t make one bit of difference to him. God gave us stewardship over animals. God did not mean for us to go about wantonly killing any of His creatures, but we are to use them for our needs.

I do not think there is one person on this thread that would choose a dumb animal over a little child. Not one. That said, I realize that dogs in and of themselves are not monsters. PEOPLE who want aggressive dogs mold the animals into anti-social, dangerous creatures. Those individuals need to be held responsible if their animals put others in harm’s way.


559 posted on 09/11/2010 6:41:38 PM PDT by Darnright (There can never be a complete confidence in a power which is excessive. - Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson