Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Eaker

Yes, the end of the debate. And it seems you prove my point by not even engaging in debate of the issue and resorting to TWO pings as pure attacks when you and I have not yet debated. I have no idea what position you hold.

Well, not exactly true. I do have “some idea”... I mean since you posted right to a set of double personal attacks and did not address ANY issues I have presented. So, that, in and of itself, pretty much is the standard reply for “I disagree and do not like what you said but have nothing to offer of my own so how about I just put out personal insults.”

I mean please.... is this your first rodeo? Or do you think since I am not one of the “regulars” on the dog bites man threads, it is mine?


51 posted on 09/10/2010 1:45:59 PM PDT by RachelFaith (2010 is going to be a 100 seat Tsunami - Welcome to "The Hunt for Red November".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: RachelFaith

I can tell you are n00bie without a clue as to how to raise dogs or probably any animal for that matter.

I have as much time for your nonsense as I have for people who think all snakes should be killed on sight.

Finally debating an issue like this with someone like you is no different than showing a chicken a card trick as you simply don’t get it. Everything you have posted is unsubstantiated feelings based neither on fact or experience.

Note, your holier than thou, I speak and you shall listen attitude is going to draw attacks as long time FReepers have seen this behavior from liberals for years.

Now until you can present peer reviewed studies to back up your feelings why don’t you just run along.


55 posted on 09/10/2010 1:53:11 PM PDT by Eaker (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson