Pinging someone that you're talking about is courteous, not trolling. Did I say you were a troll? Again what is with the martyrdom? I said Eaker was a troll. Or do you think his comments about my breasts are fine and well civil? You may have to be more careful about the online dogs with which you lay.
Saying that my mathematical and reading comprehension 'suck' is juvenile and defensive, but I've had worse.
They do. I said I was in 4H and that is was 13 to 15 years ago. As I said, if you think I am 17, you then think I was 2 in High School or there is an error in your reading or math skills. But know, that had you NOT chosen to make a post regarding my age, you could not have made the error of which I spoke. So, if my retort was defensive, it was DEFENSE IVE not offensive.
You're right, I don't want to hear your point of view that I am putting my kids in danger.
Well, at least there is one thing of which we agree.
The rest of your rant about foisting dogs off on Nana is ridiculous and absurd and I will not dignify it with further commentary. My remarks previously are sufficient.
You have dismissed the plausability (sic) of everyone else's personal experience, then ask us to accept your unquestioningly.
No. Not true. I only STATED my opinion and YOU began our exchange with sarcasm. Keep this in mind. I made only an open and honest statement of my beliefs, and YOU because of your choices, felt threatened, felt I was speaking to and about you. Now, the attorney in me would suggest this is motive of guilt, but I did not go there, until now, as you attempt to paint this as something I began. I did not. I will finish it, I will not let it be. Damn straight. But you and your sarcasm started it and Eak made it sexist and dirty and nasty and I have avoided engaging in his antics, while you defend him and say he is "just trying to engage me".
The Taliban is just trying to engage our troops too. I wish them the same luck and the same fate.
Did I say you were a troll? Again what is with the martyrdom? I said Eaker was a troll. Yes, and I was explaining to you why his behavior wasn't trolling.
Or do you think his comments about my breasts are fine and well civil?
Must...refrain...from...commenting...
They do. I said I was in 4H and that is was 13 to 15 years ago. As I said, if you think I am 17, you then think I was 2 in High School or there is an error in your reading or math skills. But know, that had you NOT chosen to make a post regarding my age, you could not have made the error of which I spoke.
I don't know diddly squat about 4H. I don't know how old you have to be to get involved in it. I was making my assumptions based on the first year you gave (1995) and your expressed intentions regarding aquiring another dog. In my theoretical marriage scenario, I based the age of 33 on the assumption that you would have to be at least 18 to be married at the time you bought the first dog. I based the age of 17 on your demeanor and logic. I'm also trying to eat ribs one-handed while I hold a baby in the other and argue with you. Cut me some slack.
Well, at least there is one thing of which we agree. The rest of your rant about foisting dogs off on Nana is ridiculous and absurd and I will not dignify it with further commentary. My remarks previously are sufficient.
I'm sure they are.
No. Not true. I only STATED my opinion and YOU began our exchange with sarcasm. Keep this in mind. I made only an open and honest statement of my beliefs, and YOU because of your choices, felt threatened, felt I was speaking to and about you.
You stated that one must never, never, never, never, never, bring an adult dog into the home, and that one must NOT have a pet before one has children. Doing so is tantamount to TRAINING your dog to attack and kill your own children. These are your words. You cast out that net, and I'm the one you dragged in. Me. You're saying that I might just as well have TRAINED my dogs to kill and eat my children. Do you really expect me not to respond to that?
Damn straight. But you and your sarcasm started it and Eak made it sexist and dirty and nasty and I have avoided engaging in his antics, while you defend him and say he is "just trying to engage me".
Oh, well, sarcasm, yeah! That's a whole other ballgame! If we start letting people respond to ill-informed and presumptous opinions with sarcasm, why, that'll be the end of us! Cats living with dogs, total anarchy! God forbid! Eaker wasn't being 'sexist and dirty and nasty' until the very end, and really if you can't accept the idea dumb people with big breasts get promoted, well, I think the terrorists have already won. Really.
