One who has questions about the past of Obama as to his Constitutional qualifications to hold the office of President. One who seeks answers to many simple questions concerning Obama's past that would determine if Obama actually does meet the Constitutional qualifications to be Commander In Chief.
An "anti-birther's" definition of the term "Birther:
One who is a nut, loon, idiot, crackpot, psycho, whacko, one who supports loons and criminals, and is racist.
We certainly can tell who the "anti-birthers" are. It sure would be nice if they would help answer the unanswered questions that birthers have instead of entering into put-downs and name calling. But not to worry, the truth will come out and the questions will be answered eventually.
"There is nothing hidden, except to be disclosed; nor is anything secret, except to come to light."--Mark 4:22
Exactly --
The leftists may have successfully prevented this issue from being adjudicated before their courts, but there is a Court of higher authority that will be convened in the not-so-distant future, the judgment of which cannot be avoided.
Judgment Day is coming and in that day they will find out the true meaning of the word "standing" ----
The leftists may have successfully prevented this issue from being adjudicated before their courts, but there is a Court of higher authority that will be convened in the not-so-distant future, the judgment of which cannot be avoided.
Judgment Day is coming and in that day they will find out the true meaning of the word “standing” ——
***
Uncle Chip, I agree with you.
But men’s laws are not God’s laws.
You know I can’t picture Jesus as a book burner.
And I really can’t see him as a birther, either.
“Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s.”
I do believe birthers are correct, but I’m not so sure they are right.
At the same time, I understand Obama’s lurch to the left had to be stopped, has to be stopped.