Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why are stories about Lucas Daniel Smith being yanked?
The Post & Email | 9/7/2010 | surfer

Posted on 09/07/2010 12:14:08 PM PDT by surfer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540541-556 last
To: seekthetruth
Good post. As it is self evident. I'll re-post it.

- - - - -

"A "birther's" definition of the term "Birther":

 
One who has questions about the past of Obama as to his Constitutional qualifications to hold the office of President. One who seeks answers to many simple questions concerning Obama's past that would determine if Obama actually does meet the Constitutional qualifications to be Commander In Chief.
 
An "anti-birther's" definition of the term "Birther:
 
One who is a nut, loon, idiot, crackpot, psycho, whacko, one who supports loons and criminals, and is racist.
 
We certainly can tell who the "anti-birthers" are.  It sure would be nice if they would help answer the unanswered questions that birthers have instead of entering into put-downs and name calling.  But not to worry, the truth will come out and the questions will be answered eventually.
 
"There is nothing hidden, except to be disclosed; nor is anything secret, except to come to light."--Mark 4:22"
 

541 posted on 09/08/2010 8:20:18 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: danamco
That's when they got contracted, part-time(?), even vets joined the choir!!!

And a few of them are likely left wing fanatics.

542 posted on 09/08/2010 8:25:46 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 477 | View Replies]

To: El Sordo
Well, Beave...I hope you learned your lesson.

Birtherism is no laughing matter...not Obama’s birth certificate and not Jean S's happy birthday thread.

543 posted on 09/08/2010 8:48:23 PM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 539 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
The actual page of Senate Pub. 103-21, page 18. See yellow highlighted area.



Senate Publication 103-21, page 18




If Obama was born outside (Likely) the US of A, it would be game, set, and match, and goodbye Obama.

544 posted on 09/08/2010 9:00:59 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth

The correct definition is - “AFTER-BIRTHER.” Just they have not cut the cord!!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Cord_%26_Placenta.jpg


545 posted on 09/08/2010 11:31:34 PM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: woofie; seekthetruth
(who should have known no one would believe his story)

I would say you are totally correct, and that's why he had enough creativity by offered it on eBay, making sure that his evidence got public attention!!!

Kind like the Gainesville pastor burning korans???

546 posted on 09/08/2010 11:38:49 PM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 484 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
From that October date last year he was able to amass more than 350 post, ONLY on these threads and ONLY on the same issue!

He did not post on any other threads or issues!!

And he did in lass than three (3) months in tandem with others, very aggressively and muddying the water!!!

547 posted on 09/08/2010 11:50:11 PM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 495 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth
A "birther's" definition of the term "Birther":

One who has questions about the past of Obama as to his Constitutional qualifications to hold the office of President. One who seeks answers to many simple questions concerning Obama's past that would determine if Obama actually does meet the Constitutional qualifications to be Commander In Chief.

An "anti-birther's" definition of the term "Birther:

One who is a nut, loon, idiot, crackpot, psycho, whacko, one who supports loons and criminals, and is racist.

We certainly can tell who the "anti-birthers" are. It sure would be nice if they would help answer the unanswered questions that birthers have instead of entering into put-downs and name calling. But not to worry, the truth will come out and the questions will be answered eventually.

"There is nothing hidden, except to be disclosed; nor is anything secret, except to come to light."--Mark 4:22

Exactly --

The leftists may have successfully prevented this issue from being adjudicated before their courts, but there is a Court of higher authority that will be convened in the not-so-distant future, the judgment of which cannot be avoided.

Judgment Day is coming and in that day they will find out the true meaning of the word "standing" ----

548 posted on 09/09/2010 6:48:56 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah; Aurorales; Jean S; El Sordo; humblegunner

We’ll take that challenge! Don’t engage us at all, ever, on eligibility threads. Don’t talk to us or about us. Let’s see what happens. I propose two weeks or more. Do you have a time frame in mind or are you just talking smack?


549 posted on 09/09/2010 8:35:05 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 538 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

The leftists may have successfully prevented this issue from being adjudicated before their courts, but there is a Court of higher authority that will be convened in the not-so-distant future, the judgment of which cannot be avoided.

Judgment Day is coming and in that day they will find out the true meaning of the word “standing” ——

***

Uncle Chip, I agree with you.

But men’s laws are not God’s laws.

You know I can’t picture Jesus as a book burner.

And I really can’t see him as a birther, either.

“Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s.”

I do believe birthers are correct, but I’m not so sure they are right.

At the same time, I understand Obama’s lurch to the left had to be stopped, has to be stopped.


550 posted on 09/09/2010 11:09:03 AM PDT by rosettasister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 548 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

That is sleazy.

I wouldn’t part with a Kidney for less than a 250,000.

What if my other kidney fails?

10,000 for a kidney ... is just plain supid.


551 posted on 09/10/2010 3:17:56 AM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca

I would sell an eye for 500,000. I could also add an ear in for another 250,000. Kidney, 250,000. No haggeling.

There all in good condition, and I would be laid up for a while after giving up these parts, so I think the price is fair. Lucas was selling himself short. 10,000 for Kidney? Damn, he was desperate, thats India prices.


552 posted on 09/10/2010 3:32:29 AM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

IF Obama has a Kenyan BC, it would be worth millions. If I had it, I would sell it. I could use the money.

Heck, If Obama had a Hawiian BC I would sell it. But so far that hasn’t been proven. I suspect people in Hawaii have sold their silence. Can you imagine the temptation to pull his records and sell them?


553 posted on 09/10/2010 3:54:06 AM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: woofie

I’ll give you 5 bucks.

If you dont sell know, the news could be stale in a week. He may move on to the next woman.


554 posted on 09/10/2010 5:25:08 AM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: woofie
I find it interesting that the media does not seem interested in the question (Who is Bill Clinton dating?)...

You have to apply a little Sherlockian analysis to the situation.

All through Bush's eight years in office, clinton kept popping up like a bad penny. He just wouldn't go away. The Clinton library, UN Committees, Canadian parliamentary girl friends, the war in Iraq, you name it.

Then along came Obama, and he instructed the news media: "Shut up about clinton! This is all about me!"

So they did.

Therefore, if you have a problem about clinton's latest girlfriend, you'll have to take it up with Obama. Don't blame the media. They just do what they're told.

555 posted on 09/13/2010 8:23:46 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: rosettasister

I stand corrected —

We still have time and should be believing and preaching the Grace and Mercy of the Lord Jesus Christ by His Blood that was shed on the Cross. That and that alone.

The Gospel is that Jesus died for our sins according to the scriptures, was buried and rose from the dead the third day according to the scriptures. And whomsoever believes this shall be saved.


556 posted on 10/03/2010 3:17:30 PM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540541-556 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson