Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RachelFaith

I agree battleships like this would be a far more effective tool against low tech warfare such as Iran would use or any country with pirates hijacking ships.

What I am implying is that naval warfare with countries like Iran will involve disguised vessels with modern weaponry, the armored brute strength of these battleships would make them much more the victor than a thin hulled vessel.


47 posted on 09/05/2010 9:56:07 PM PDT by Eye of Unk ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" G.Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Eye of Unk

Agreed. Nothing short of a direct hit with a NUKE will take out a Battleship. Whereas a $10,000 missile will put any lessor ship on the bottom of the sea in minutes. Just ask the British about the HMS Sheffield during the Falkland Islands’ war.


50 posted on 09/05/2010 11:03:26 PM PDT by RachelFaith (2010 is going to be a 100 seat Tsunami - Welcome to "The Hunt for Red November".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson