Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/31/2010 2:13:53 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


"The static test fire of the first stage of an Ares 1 rocket at ATK west of Brigham City went off on time without a hitch on Tuesday, Aug. 31, at 9:27 a.m."Al Hartmann | Salt Lake Tribune
2 posted on 08/31/2010 2:15:48 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Is the booster segmented and are there O-rings between them?


4 posted on 08/31/2010 2:34:08 PM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Shouldn’t we be getting away from such rockets, and be developing newer technologies that will get us deeper into space, faster?


7 posted on 08/31/2010 2:44:27 PM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
A solic-fuel booster big enough to launch a moon mission is a giant leap forward.

The Minute Man III is probably one of the biggest solid-fuel rockets we have and it lifts only about 2000lbs and is barely orbital.

A moon mission would require at least 20,000lbs.

13 posted on 08/31/2010 3:29:12 PM PDT by Mariner (USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

info on Ares I:
http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/aresi.htm

simulated launch:
http://www.technologyreview.com/video/?vid=378

op-ed:
http://www.newscientist.com/mobile/article/dn18408-ares-i-is-safest-choice-to-replace-shuttle.html

the current SRB proposed for use as a crew booster:
http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/srbcev.htm

loads of proposed and actual rockets:
http://www.astronautix.com/fam/orbhicle.htm


18 posted on 08/31/2010 4:55:58 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

shuttle:
http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/shuleiss.htm

shuttle-derived vehicles:
http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/shuttle.htm

shuttle SRB:
http://www.astronautix.com/stages/shulesrb.htm


19 posted on 08/31/2010 5:08:57 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Saturn V:
http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/saturnv.htm

F1 engine:
http://www.astronautix.com/engines/f1.htm


20 posted on 08/31/2010 5:13:16 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

saved from the now-defunct Beal Aerospace website:

Status

Name

Nationality

Thrust**

Propellants

Notes

Out-of-production

F-1

USA

1.7 million

Liquid Oxygen - Kerosene

5 used in each Apollo Saturn Stage 1. Flown between 1967 to 1973.

Development stopped

RD-270

USSR

1.5 million

Nitrogen Tetroxide - UDMH

Tested, but never flown. Largest single-chamber engine designed by USSR.

Development stopped

M-1

USA

1.2 million

Liquid Oxygen - Liquid Hydrogen

Designed as replacement for F-1. Program canceled in 1966.

In production

 

BA-810

USA

810,000

Hydrogen Peroxide - Kerosene

Stage 2 engine of BA-2 launch vehicle. First test 1Q 2000; first flight 2002.

In production

 

RS-68

USA

745,000

Liquid Oxygen - Liquid Hydrogen

Currently in development and production for use on Delta IV launch vehicle.


21 posted on 08/31/2010 5:14:42 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

the Ares Mobile Launcher:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2481744/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1663407/posts


23 posted on 08/31/2010 5:38:57 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson