Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA tests most powerful booster rocket ever
AFP) – ^ | 1 hour ago

Posted on 08/31/2010 2:13:47 PM PDT by BenLurkin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 08/31/2010 2:13:53 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

"The static test fire of the first stage of an Ares 1 rocket at ATK west of Brigham City went off on time without a hitch on Tuesday, Aug. 31, at 9:27 a.m."Al Hartmann | Salt Lake Tribune
2 posted on 08/31/2010 2:15:48 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Making Muslims feel good should be the priority of NASA.


3 posted on 08/31/2010 2:33:10 PM PDT by Dallas59 (President Robert Gibbs 2009-2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Is the booster segmented and are there O-rings between them?


4 posted on 08/31/2010 2:34:08 PM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Great...maybe we can market it to the Muslim nations needing lift capacity.


5 posted on 08/31/2010 2:34:34 PM PDT by dogcaller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

Obozo Hussein is the Figurehead and Puppet for the Muslim Attack on America and Her Freedoms! There can be no other Conclusion!


6 posted on 08/31/2010 2:37:44 PM PDT by True Republican Patriot (May GOD Continue to BLESS Our Greatest President :George W. Bush!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Shouldn’t we be getting away from such rockets, and be developing newer technologies that will get us deeper into space, faster?


7 posted on 08/31/2010 2:44:27 PM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cicero2k
Is the booster segmented and are there O-rings between them?

A fair question. Making a tube long enough and straight enough without segmentation I think would be a daunting task.

An even better question might be: "Is the booster constructed in such a way that burn-through can't happen, no matter what the temperature?

Of course, this all is supposed to be in support of the Ares program, which explicitly keeps everything in a vertical stack, with the most sensitive items up top. This way, each element in the stack can have issues, but the odds of it destroying the sensitive item at the top is diminished.

After seeing how failure modes combined with horizontal integration has lead to 14 dead astronauts, it was a no-brainer.

8 posted on 08/31/2010 2:46:02 PM PDT by Yossarian (A pro-life democrat is one who holds out for something in return for his pro-abortion vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

Could we have the Gitmo gang stand close to the rocket test?


9 posted on 08/31/2010 2:47:44 PM PDT by bmwcyle (It is Satan's fault)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

Newer GREENER technologies without such an ugly carbon footprint!!!!!


10 posted on 08/31/2010 2:50:50 PM PDT by ichabod1 (Hail Mary Full of Grace, The Lord Is With Thee...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian
A fair question. Making a tube long enough and straight enough without segmentation I think would be a daunting task.

I was under the impression that the primary reason for segmenting the shuttle boosters was transport; they had to be able to fit it on trains to get from the factory to Florida.

11 posted on 08/31/2010 2:59:59 PM PDT by Vroomfondel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I saw a couple of shuttle booster test firings out there; a pretty amazing experience.


12 posted on 08/31/2010 3:00:43 PM PDT by Vroomfondel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
A solic-fuel booster big enough to launch a moon mission is a giant leap forward.

The Minute Man III is probably one of the biggest solid-fuel rockets we have and it lifts only about 2000lbs and is barely orbital.

A moon mission would require at least 20,000lbs.

13 posted on 08/31/2010 3:29:12 PM PDT by Mariner (USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dogcaller

It takes a lot of lift to get a mosque into orbit.


14 posted on 08/31/2010 3:34:32 PM PDT by Rebelbase (Political correctness in America today is a Rip Van Winkle acid trip.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dogcaller

“Great...maybe we can market it to the Muslim nations needing lift capacity.”

Would be great for a pig roast.


15 posted on 08/31/2010 3:37:18 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Remember March 23, 1775. Remember March 23, 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

I bet 100 megatons or so could get one into orbit. Let’s experiment.


16 posted on 08/31/2010 4:24:38 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cicero2k

“Is the booster segmented and are there O-rings between them?”

Since AFAIK these are five-segment SRBs, the answers are yes and yes.


17 posted on 08/31/2010 4:26:44 PM PDT by No Truce With Kings (I can see November from my house.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

info on Ares I:
http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/aresi.htm

simulated launch:
http://www.technologyreview.com/video/?vid=378

op-ed:
http://www.newscientist.com/mobile/article/dn18408-ares-i-is-safest-choice-to-replace-shuttle.html

the current SRB proposed for use as a crew booster:
http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/srbcev.htm

loads of proposed and actual rockets:
http://www.astronautix.com/fam/orbhicle.htm


18 posted on 08/31/2010 4:55:58 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

shuttle:
http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/shuleiss.htm

shuttle-derived vehicles:
http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/shuttle.htm

shuttle SRB:
http://www.astronautix.com/stages/shulesrb.htm


19 posted on 08/31/2010 5:08:57 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Saturn V:
http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/saturnv.htm

F1 engine:
http://www.astronautix.com/engines/f1.htm


20 posted on 08/31/2010 5:13:16 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson