Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: antiRepublicrat
Quite true, but that's a geek thing. It doesn't apply to the vast majority of buyers.

Given that Android shipments are outstripping the iPhone, I think the majority of buyers are fine with Android. It's taking over the market, already having a larger marketshare than iOS, and extending that lead.

31 posted on 08/23/2010 8:12:38 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: PugetSoundSoldier
Given that Android shipments are outstripping the iPhone, I think the majority of buyers are fine with Android.

For now. The iPhone is revolutionary for two reasons: One, coming up with the first usable touch-only metaphor, and (probably more importantly) breaking the carrier stranglehold on innovation and application distribution. Android only works because it followed the Apple model. If the slide towards carrier control continues, it will ruin Android. It would be quite easy for the carriers to remove the Market from their Android devices, forcing customers back to the old model.

This isn't a problem with the technical merits of Android at all. It's a problem with Android's openness, what would normally be an advantage, being used against it.

Openness even introduces another problem. Carriers like to brand phones, introducing their own UIs and standard apps. This fragments the Android experience. You don't get an "Android phone," you get an HTC or Samsung phone based on Android. You know some branding is bound to be inferior, leading to an undeserved negative opinion of Android.

49 posted on 08/24/2010 6:21:38 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson