You misunderstood my point, because I admittedly didn’t develop it the right way. My premise is that any individual aspect of the total Obama ‘mystery’ could , and is probably designed to be, a red herring that could lead people to harp on one , in particular the BC “magic bullet” of proving he’s not eligible,to the exclusion of all others.
THey’re all interlocked, and all the pieces of the “Who is Obama” puzzle could contain small or large proofs of his identity and maybe his constitutional ineligibility.
One large part of both Obama’s and his Democratic Party’s
desperation in cramming their agenda down our throats is because they many KNOW that they’re in a race against the clock, and that inevitably so much ill-will and loathing will come to them and their man, that the MAIN thing they can’t afford to have revealed is that he’s a total charlatan, a literally counterfeit entity who went right ahead and allowed himself to be ‘elected’ President when he shouldn’t even have been a candidate.
No, no I didn't...and you didn't develope anything because you have nothing to say.
The Constitution states that no one who is not a Natural Born Citizen can be POTUS.
His "BC" is no more a distraction than his health care plan, his take over of GM, the banks and financial institutions....it's all unconstitutional, what do you suggest is the "winning issue"?