What does that have to do with this situation? We aren't talking about a white girl giving up her baby to adoption to conceal her shame, we are talking about a white girl taking a black baby from dad's hooker and pretending to be it's mother to save a black hooker from "social stigma", does that make sense to you?
Not that I subscribe to the "black girl and Grandpa Dunham" theory. I have my own theory as I earlier posted above. Be that as it may, if it actually occurred, all of the above would make sense, although not because of social stigma.
Many people firmly believe in the concept that blood is thicker than water.
In medical school, medical students are in demand for "donations" to the Sperm Bank. A prospective mother wants a "smart" donor? Donor 346 was smart enough to succeed in medical school. My medical school roommate was a regular donor. As far as siring offspring, he was right up there with Man-o-War.
It was an easy way to make money but I never considered it.
Why? Because having your own flesh and blood being raised somewhere by an unknown stranger just felt wrong.
Perhaps Grandpa Dunham felt the same way. He could not bear to have his own flesh and blood adopted out and raised by an unknown stranger, never to be seen again.
But, would a daughter trouble herself so for the concept that blood is thicker than water? Even in the case of her father's illegitimate son?
Before Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor and King of Spain died, he let it be known by a codicil in his will providing financial support and showing great interest in the future welfare of an unknown boy that he probably had an illegitimate son by a German mistress. That illegitimate son had, in fact, been raised in Spain, as a regular Spanish boy, in a town outside of Madrid, by one of Charles' friends, Don Luis de Quijada, without the boy or anybody in the town having any knowledge of the boy's origins.
After he was King of Spain, Philip II summoned Don Luis de Quijada and the truth came out about his father's illegitimate son. Philip then asked Don Luis to bring the boy to a hunt. (Accidents happen on hunts all the time, ya know.)
Don Luis brought the boy, and told him to bow as the man in front of him was His Majesty, the King. King Philip asked the boy if he knew who his father was and the embarrassed boy answered, "No".
Philip then embraced the boy, told him that they shared the same father and were thus brothers. Philip treated the boy as a brother for the rest of his life.
The boy grew up to be Don Juan of Austria and destroyed Islamic sea power in the Mediterranean when he annihilated the Turkish fleet at the Battle of Lepanto
All because King Philip II believed, even in the case of his father's illegitimate children, that blood was thicker than water.
So, the conduct does make sense.
Where the "black girl and Gandpa Dunham" theory runs into trouble is how to explain that Grandma Dunhan had no problem with her alleged gradson. Stanley Ann Dunham would have had to go away for a while and then come back with, "Surprise, Mom! I have a mixed race child!"
If somebody on the Left reads this thread, they will claim that we are kooks with "conspiracy theories".
In reality, it is a documented fact that Obama has spent a considerable amount of time, money and effort to hide the original entries in his original birth certificate.
We are just having fun playing the game "Try to guess what Obama is trying so hard to hide and why".