Exactly.
He did this in the presence of the cops, which was a dumb move on his part.
Had he waited he would have accomplished his goal, not gotten beat up and the cops would not have known they had somebody to refute their story.
That is what the man is claiming occurred.
Watch the video, the man was up on the sidewalk and the cops walked over to him.
Stepping into the middle of it and basically inferring that the cops were lying was not a good plan.
Where are you seeing that?
That is not what I saw. I saw the cops walk up to the citizen who was standing on the sidewalk.
That was how it was reported verbally by the broadcaster.
You should watch the video.
The dog walker did not walk into the middle of anything. The cops walk towards the dog walker, who is clearly up on the sidewalk, and no where near a citizens receiving a ticket.
He did this in the presence of the cops, which was a dumb move on his part.
What are you taking about?
The beating did not occur while the dog walker was talking to the motorist.
Had he waited he would have accomplished his goal, not gotten beat up and the cops would not have known they had somebody to refute their story.
Did you watch the video?
The motorist was not attacked for speaking to a motorist. The beating occured after that, while the dog walker was standing on the sidewalk, by himself.
You don't seem to be paying attention here.
The motorist was not attacked for speaking to a motorist. The beating occurred after that, while the dog walker was standing on the sidewalk, by himself.
You don't seem to be paying attention here.
Are you defending these cops in this incident, as you seem to imply that the dog walker asked to be attacked by the cops, and you seem to be suggesting this was the dog walkers fault.
Ya, you are defending the cops here.
You've been told repeatedly, the attack occurred after the dog walker spoke with the motorist, which the video depicts, yet you completely ignore this glaring fact.
Why would you defend the cops in this incident?