[Lurking Libertarian]

This would be a good law school exam question: how many violations of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure can you find in the first 5 pages?

This is a stream-of-consciousness rant, not an appellate brief. There are no citations to the Record on Appeal; "facts" are discussed which were not placed before the trial court; there is not even an attempt to discuss the cases or reasoning relied upon by Judge Carter; I could go on and on. I expect the Court will strike the Brief and/or sanction Orly.

[BuckeyeTexan]

This would be a good law school exam question: how many violations of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure can you find in the first 5 pages?

Give me a hint. 5?

"As the court reads the final order, it becomes obvious, one does not have to be a Perry Mason, does not have to be a licensed attorney, to know, that the order was written by the defense attorney and rubber stamped by the judge."

Um, that's good, because she's no Perry Mason. Bwahahaha!

[El Sordo]

“how many violations of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure can you find in the first 5 pages?”

All of them?