Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nathan Bedford Forrest and Racial Reconciliation
American Catholic ^ | Friday, August 6th, 2010

Posted on 08/08/2010 3:04:04 AM PDT by GonzoII

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: Sherman Logan
Here’s a reference to the organization in a 2001 reference book. I would assume it was a genuine paramilitary group.

Do you honestly think Forrest would address a black para-military group in the Reconstruction South? The man who headed the Klan for a while?

21 posted on 08/08/2010 8:35:38 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Nathan Bedford Forrest did not found the Ku-Klux Klan. How many times must that historical error be corrected?


22 posted on 08/08/2010 8:40:36 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Som tasim `aleykha melekh 'asher yivchar HaShem 'Eloqeykha bo . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Perhaps he could envision a future when people would attempt to turn history on its head, claim that the United States was inherently racist, and that the poor beleaguered south was just trying to help its colored folks out.

Maybe then?!


23 posted on 08/08/2010 8:41:38 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator

It was only Grant’s very real threat to go sherman on Forrest that made him dissolve the Klan.


24 posted on 08/08/2010 8:44:30 AM PDT by usmcobra (NASA outreach to Muslims if I were in charge:The complete collection of "I dream of Jeannie" on DVD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
Nathan Bedford Forrest did not found the Ku-Klux Klan. How many times must that historical error be corrected?

How many times does the difference between 'headed' and 'founded' have to be explained to you ZC?

Maybe if you tried reading the words that are written instead of substituting your own, you wouldn't have this recurring problem.

25 posted on 08/08/2010 8:51:46 AM PDT by mac_truck ( Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
And what Lost Cause fantasy site did you dredge that up from?

wiki

26 posted on 08/08/2010 8:53:34 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: usmcobra

It’s interesting that I have found no other character of prominence in the Civil War besides Forrest who ever used an enemy soldier as a human shield to hasten his getaway.


27 posted on 08/08/2010 8:53:56 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck
How many times does the difference between 'headed' and 'founded' have to be explained to you ZC?

Maybe if you tried reading the words that are written instead of substituting your own, you wouldn't have this recurring problem.

Wow. I oughta bookmark this post. It's the first time anyone has mistaken me for a Confederate apologist--me, whose Southern ancestors were Unionists and were targeted by the original KKK!

Nathan Beford Forrest was the Grand Wizard (I think that was the title) of the Invisible Empire of the South, organized in 1867. He ordered it disbanded in 1869.

The "Ku-Klux Klan" was founded as a lark by a few veterans in Pulaski TN in 1866. After their constumes frightened some Blacks it became the terrorist organization we think of today.

No one's ever pointed out the difference between "headed" and "founded" because everyone always says "Forrest founded the KKK." Heading and founding are two different things.

28 posted on 08/08/2010 8:58:54 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Som tasim `aleykha melekh 'asher yivchar HaShem 'Eloqeykha bo . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Google turns up a fair number of uses of the story.

http://www.google.ca/#hl=en&source=hp&q=%22Forrest+offered+freedom+to+44+of+his+slaves+%22&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=%22Forrest+offered+freedom+to+44+of+his+slaves+%22&gs_rfai=&fp=acec9d3c512d5d32


29 posted on 08/08/2010 9:04:41 AM PDT by Hieronymus (It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. --G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
Nathan Bedford Forrest did not found the Ku-Klux Klan.

And, who did?

30 posted on 08/08/2010 9:06:51 AM PDT by LouAvul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
Nathan Bedford Forrest did not found the Ku-Klux Klan.

And, who did?

Sigh. I get so tired of repeating this.

The "Ku-Klux Klan" was founded in Plaski TN in 1866 by a few Confederate veterans of Scottish descent (hence the "klan" part). It originally had no terrorist intentions but after ghost costumes frightened some Blacks members started using it to terrorize them.

In 1867 it was reorganized as The Invisible Empire of the South. N.B. Forrest was the head of that organization. He ordered it disbanded in 1869. But the "Ku-Klux Klan" (anyone with a sheet on) continued to operate until federal force was used against them.

Doesn't anyone here know any history?

31 posted on 08/08/2010 9:11:53 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Som tasim `aleykha melekh 'asher yivchar HaShem 'Eloqeykha bo . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator

I asked an honest question. No need for you to become so prissy.


32 posted on 08/08/2010 9:47:31 AM PDT by LouAvul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

“This ‘alleged’ Speech”?


33 posted on 08/08/2010 9:53:44 AM PDT by BnBlFlag (Deo Vindice/Semper Fidelis "Ya gotta saddle up your boys; Ya gotta draw a hard line")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
I asked an honest question. No need for you to become so prissy.

I became "prissy" because I'd already explained this.

34 posted on 08/08/2010 9:55:00 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Som tasim `aleykha melekh 'asher yivchar HaShem 'Eloqeykha bo . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

I’m skeptical. Especially that he spoke as quoted.

I’d sure like to something contemporary on the subject.

Everything I can find is within the last few years.


35 posted on 08/08/2010 10:01:57 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
It's the first time anyone has mistaken me for a Confederate apologist

Frankly, you sound more like a plain old Klan apologist than any other kind.

Are there any more cheerful historical 'facts' you think we should know about that benevolent and much maligned civic organization?

36 posted on 08/08/2010 10:06:50 AM PDT by mac_truck ( Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan; Non-Sequitur
Google is changing the way we think about the past by putting all these sources online. The previous times this issue came up there wasn't anything about the group available online, apart from the neo-confederate version of the Forrest story.

I'm still somewhat skeptical about the story. I'd want to know more about what all the papers reported. Apparently, he did deliver some gracious and conciliatory remarks. Just exactly what he said, though, is harder to nail down. More here.

Some of the circumstances: Forrest had the diabetes that would kill him two years later, so it's just possible that he felt a little penitent. It's said that he underwent a religious conversion and joined a church in his last years.

Also, this was the tail end of Reconstruction and there was a push on to get at least some African-American support for the Democrats.

And if you were a former slave owner and slave trader and Confederate General surrounded by Black men who may have had guns with them, you might be conciliatory too.

37 posted on 08/08/2010 12:46:53 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

bttt


38 posted on 08/08/2010 7:07:18 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

You educated me about him a long time ago. I only knew one aspect of his biography—the cliff notes version taught in school. He was indeed interesting, and more complex than detractors would admit.


39 posted on 08/08/2010 9:58:43 PM PDT by Defiant (Conservatives love the Constitution. Democrats love changing the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Not this one again. I’ve seen the organization identified as “Independent Order of Pole Bearers” and the “Jubilee of Pole Bearers”. It’s been called a fraternal organization and at civil rights organization and a para-military organization. But the only time it is ever mentioned in any documentation I’ve ever seen is in connection with this alleged Forrest speech. No other mention of any kind. The story is most likely apocryphal.

You might have looked a little harder.

See African American southerners in slavery, Civil War, and Reconstruction By Claude H. Nolen, in particular, Chapter Ten, Politics and the Ku Klux Klan, in particular page 158 and 159,

...Impressively organized, the blacks paraded down Main Street to Beale Street and on to James Park, in order: a brass band of the Sons of Ham, in a wagon; 24 marshals on horseback; two bearers of batter axes, with blue swallow-tail coats and striped pants; a band dressed in Zouave, with red breeches; chaplain in black, bearing the Scriptures; Independent Order of Pole-Bearers, 250 strong, with banners, 36 girls in white, riding in a wagon drawn by four horses ....

40 posted on 08/09/2010 2:46:07 PM PDT by archy (I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson