Exactly MY point.
However, they DO NOT BLAME SPECIFIC BREEDS for this
You just admitted that they did.
Lemme know if you win the argument that you're having with yourself.
Oh, ok, I get it. So you think because more dogs of a certain breed are represented in the figures, that experts should be blaming them for the attacks? No matter the circumstances surrounding the attacks? Just based on this one detail? Seems pretty myopic.
The experts blame irresponsible dog owners because that factor is present no matter what breed is involved. The breeds are simply chosen by these owners, but are interchangeable depending on what’s “in” in the thug/young idiot world. That is why the numbers do not inflate when pit bulls suddenly outnumber german shepherds. They have replaced them in the numbers, not added to them.
I never once said the experts BLAME specific breeds of dog. I said they show that specific breeds are RESPONSIBLE for more attacks than others. The word “responsible” can be used in more than one way, in case you were wondering.
You are misinterpreting the meaning (probably on purpose) so that it fits your argument, but the truth can be plainly seen. If you are going to continue to argue semantics, I will not be participating. If you have no rational argument, no proof of your claims, and all you want to do is rearrange what I have said to force-fit it into what you perceive to be the truth, go right ahead, but anyone still reading will see that you are being petty, and not really getting anywhere. The studies I have spoken about do not change because you want them to. They are still there, waiting for you to open your eyes and read them. Until then, I suggest you find someone else to dance with.