To: An.American.Expatriate
"Actually your question is backwards - where was the federal government given the right to force a state to remain?"
No it's not. The Southern states could have called a constitutional convention, they could have tried to do so politically. They chose to do it through force (in the article) which is armed rebellion. The rebellion was put down.
To: Old Teufel Hunden
The Southern states could have called a constitutional convention, they could have tried to do so politically. They did not have to. Just as no convention is necessary to grant rights, no convention is necessary to assert them.
138 posted on
08/05/2010 8:50:15 AM PDT by
An.American.Expatriate
(Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson