People laugh about WND and Farrah being sensational focused, but they are like a dog after a bone. Totally relentlessly on top of this from day 1.
This is getting real interesting. It is however incredible that it has taken almost 2 years to get to this point.
Obozo is going down. The question is when and who will be sucked down with him in the vortex he draws. My prayer is that the Dem will be so discredited that they will never again offer a credible political front in the U.S.
There will be many Traitors who must be tried, convicted, sentenced and punished.
If anyone knowingly helped a man with foreign citizenship into the presidency, they should be hung on a tree outside of the White House.
Don't count on it. "They" are setting him up in their own little dictatorship. We The People haven't been able to do anything to stop it. It'll be long after we're gone and in the history books before he's down and out.
Just yesterday a friend brought up that she's beginning to fear that the America we know is slipping away and that something very bad is on the horizon. She fears our generation will be the last to know prosperity and freedom but that our children's generation will be hit with something they won't survive. She said she was "scared." Though she hadn't heard about prepping, that's what she's started to do and is trying to get debit paid off, looking into long shelf life foods, getting defenses ready and trying to convince her husband to stock more ammo. I find it frightening that so many who don't follow the news often or follow the BC controversy are seeing something is wrong, very wrong.
And serious news consumers dismiss WND and Farah because their reporting is less than trustworthy. This article is a prime example of why, because the evidence underlying it is totally bogus.
Kovacs writes in this article "A simple search of the high court's own website reveals Kagan's name coming up at least nine times on dockets involving Obama eligibility issues." In one of the captions in the article, he writes "Searching the dockets at the U.S. Supreme Court's website reveals Elena Kagan's name coming up numerous times on cases challenging President Obama's constitutional eligibility for office." And of course the article's title is "Elena Kagan tied to Obama's birth certificate."
Kovacs' ONLY source for ANY of these claims is this link. So let's look at what's at that link.
First of all, there aren't nine distinct cases there. There are only six different plaintiffs, with two of the plaintiffs having more than one case listing.
Louis Lutz is a fruitcake who sued Bush for $100 billion, and then appealed his way up to the Supreme Court.
Jerome Julius Brown and Gary William Holt are prisoners, and their cases appear to be civil rights claims.
The Real Truth About Obama, Inc., Petitioner v. Federal Election Commission was an FEC case about anti-Obama ads about abortion.
And Abdul Hamid Abdul Salam Al-Ghizzawi and Jamal Kiyemba were Guantanamo detainees who filed suit over their detention.
In other words, out of those "nine times" that Kovacs says Kagan was involved in eligibility cases, it appears that precisely ZERO of the cases he identifies actually involved Obama eligibility issues.
Nope, nothing about Obama's eligibility in a single one of them. The article isn't even based on an exaggerated number; it's based on a completely false premise. Notice how Kovacs doesn't bother to quote anything from any of the cases that shows they're eligibility-related; he just says they are, and hopes that no one will check to see if he's telling the truth or not.