Well, you may have a point...if a basic religious duty of white anglo-Christians is the eventual domination of the world, be it by the heart, tongue, hand, or sword (whatever Christians would call the jihad bil qalb, bil lisan, bil yad, or bil saif).
(Not to say that Christians don't believe in spreading the good news...but there's not been too much record of the "by the sword" technique...especially in the past 4-500 years)
Sorry, pal, the only example I can think of where Muslims and Christians lived well together was in Lebanon. And that sort of went by the wayside about 30 years ago, didn't it?
As have Iraq and elsewhere.
Nothing against you personally (since I do not know you personally), but you know when Ibrahim Hooper was opening up his trap and rationalizing terrorism? I didn't see anybody spout up against him and tell him he was full of it. (And, if on no other channel, Fox News would have loved that debate...but it didn't happen)
So, sorry...but Muslims (who I used to have a whole lot of respect for) lost a whole lot of credibility with me after that. (And I'm speaking as somebody who lived for three years in Muslim Turkey and loved it)
So it isn't anything personal against you...but excuse me for noticing something when I just happen to recognize that one of the key goals of your religion is for everybody to be Muslim (check) by whatever means necessary (uh-oh).