... hey, it happened to the pigs.
Hmmn - a religious defense to animal cruelty, A.K.A “killing an animal without paying a vet to do it”.
If he sincerely believed the dog was possessed by an evil spitit, and his faith is such that this was his form of exorcism, he will not be convicted. Assuming a good lawyer, that is.
Seems the Constitution is quite specific about freedom of religion.
After all, the Santaria bite the heads off live birds, and cut goat throats as part of their religion.
The Supreme Court ruled their practices were protected by the Constitution.
Florida has weird laws for animals. My nieces husband spent 3 month’s in county for killing his 13 year old cat eaten up by tumors. Could of paid a vet $100 to avoid the troubles.
1. Animals are property.
2. Chihuahuas are crazy, dachshunds are insane. A mix between the two? I believe the man.
Well, it could have been. But the problem is, where did the demons go next?
Any relation to Huckabee?
I hope they keep a close eye on this man. Showing no emotion while explaining his stabbing, skinning and disemboweling of a dog sounds like the man is a sociopath, who uses religion as a cover.
The problem is, how do you tell the difference between demonic possession and the normal breed characteristics of a chihuahua mix?
He's another Jeffrey Dahmer waiting to bloom...