You're joking right? You acknowledged that under your the policy you prefer "some children will be beaten, seduced, raped, even killed," but you accuse someone of making a strawman by asking about child prostitution?
Are you saying that you OPPOSE laws against prostitution?
I am trying to maintain some humor, a tad difficult after some of the erroneous attacks, the argumentium ad homenium replies, ad nauseam.
Not owning a whore house, not even a “ho” house, I never really considered the issue. I would assume the legality of prostitution to be a matter for the local community, as clearly the Constitution says nothing about it.
Once again, very slowly (yes, I am trying to inject a bit of humor) - “Given that government has proven that it can not reduce child abuse by passing laws, what next?”
Keep in mind that the anarchist masquerading as a libertarian considers local government to be equally as dangerous as the Federal government. Doubt it? test them.
True libertarian thinkers understand that the Constitution recognizes state and local governments as the proper source for criminal lawmaking.
I have a great disdain for the creep of government, but the law is the law. If you don’t like it, get it changed. If you can’t change it. Run for office and get it changed.