“This can’t be considered anything else but a defense of paedophilia...not an effective defense but a defense just the same.”
My, my! TOuchy, and nasty, aren’t you?
Do consider I raised the questions because most males, nearly all cultures, and virtually all of recorded history indicates no “damage” from a young male having willing, not forced sex with a female.
Are you part of those who make a living in the child abuse industry, perchance?
“Do consider I raised the questions because most males, nearly all cultures, and virtually all of recorded history indicates no “damage” from a young male having willing, not forced sex with a female.”
This is a wild claim. Any sex outside of marriage carries with it emotional harm as well as risk of physical harm.
Do consider I raised the questions because most males, nearly all cultures, and virtually all of recorded history indicates no “damage” from a young male having willing, not forced sex with a female.
A 12 year old is a child. A child cannot willingly have sex as all sex with a child is non-consentual by nature. That makes it rape. Rape is illegal. Raping children is pedophilia. You are defending pedophilia. In the immortal words of a freeper that I can't recall at the moment "this isn't rocket surgery". The idea that a 38 year old woman having sex with a 12 year old isn't going to damage the 12 year old is preposterous...and completely beside the point.
No I'm employed in the private sector in scientific field. What do you do?