Replies

"Your attempt at comparing SARAH to Mitt is laughable!"

There are a lot of differences between the two, I am not denying that. There is also one big similarity. Both have taken positions on key issues that should rule them out as a choice to lead conservatives. With Mitt, it is his health care plan. With Sarah it was her pushing publicly for the passage of the Law of the Sea Treaty in 2007 while she was still Governor of Alaska.

Both have done other things that are questionable in my mind, but the two issues mentioned above are deal killers in and of themselves. Mitt's shortcomings are well known and have been spelled out in great detail on this site. When considering who to back for the President, an issue like support for the Law of the Sea Treaty is a MAJOR consideration. That monstrosity presents an significant threat to our sovereignty and all serious conservatives have unequivocally rejected it. The fact that this issue is largely ignored when considering Sarah as the person to lead the conservative movement is a real mystery to me.

Not sure if you are aware of it - but your posts are so media/so slanted - NO conservative would take you serious - and your attempt at it makes for a good laugh! Your’s is a dime a dozen post.

Rock on SARAH! The weak can’t handle a strong conservative woman so they talk, talk, talk about you thinking their words have power! LOL!