No I don’t. Why debate it? As I said, that is what primaries are for. The voters will decide what they can stand and what they can’t stand. Fair enough? I don’t think the Palin’s are bad parents for having a wild child.
I had one myself. I also had two that were not.
I also was not wanting to run for President and wouldn’t have based on the trouble the wild child could create.
Because it's more productive than personal attacks.
Maybe PALIN decided that having a 'normal' daughter who was going through the same experience most young women go through, and was making mistakes because she isn't perfect, was no more of a reason to give up her GOALS in LIFE, than having a child with DOWNS SYNDROME.
That right there could be a REAL PROBLEM, especially if the MSM tried to make a big deal out of it.
OOOPS, they did.
What YOU may see as in insurmountable problem, doesn't seem anything but another ant hill to Sarah Palin, from what I've witnessed.
WINNERS are like that. They see STEPS instead of WALLS.