Please remember that when the Soviet Union fell, the first sites liberated and occupied were the TV and radio stations. This was a wise move. So?...What's your plan for controlling the message?
Before doing what you suggest ( which by the way is certainly a good option) I would try marching on New York City first.
One of the problems with these huge marches, such as the Tea Party or the yearly March for Life is the lack of news coverage. It is time to get in the faces of the main stream media and, through the pressure of numbers, **force** them to fairly cover the issues. With fair reporting, perhaps we could have a peaceful legislative solution instead of having to shut down the government with a “sit in”.
You're kidding me, right?? We're discussing retaking control of this country and you are concerned with whether or not it will be covered fairly and in a balanced way by the DBM??
Of course it won't be covered fairly or objectively, but that's NOT the primary goal. The primary goal is to rid our government of the very people who are h&ll bent on destroying what has been the greatest nation on this earth!!
However, since you raise the issue, I have been giving consideration to a plan that MIGHT (not likely) force the DBM to see how large of an audience they are alienatingn with their lies, manipulation and outright coverup of the news. Let's ignore them for a month! No newspapers (except for the conservative ones), no national news broadcasts (buh-bye Katie, Brian and Charlie!), no magazines, no NPR or PBS. We cancel subscriptions and turn the DBM off. And, if we do this during a ratings sweep month (like November), their advertising rates will plummet so significantly that they will be unable to maintain the staffing they have today, or their circulation.
So, how is THAT for addressing the issue of fair and balanced news coverage??