Being a jerk won’t persuade the disinclined to the truth faster.
Orly is being a jerk.
To the contrary, she’s wrecking the cause.
Winning before SCOTUS requires long, persistent precision and politeness (as learned the hard way by many other causes such as RKBA). if you don’t win, refine your argument and tone and try again; switching to whiny bitch mode is counterproductive.
Orly’s asking perfectly good questions. You are just using the Alinsky smear tactic. Sorry, won’t work, not this time, and when the truth outs, it will be the end for the Democrat Party.
Persistent precision and politeness?
How about an argument that fits with their agenda?
Like the abortion activists argument in the Roe v. Wade case?
Or the homosexual activists argument in the Lawrence case?
Both of these were “staged,” with NO actual injury, but the court gave then STANDING in order to advance their agenda.
The Supreme Court arbitrarily created rights, unconstitutionally in both of these major cases, even as they, with the “great pomp” of their position, stole land from private citizens unconstitutionally in the Kelo case.
Polite precision doesn’t matter when you are dealing with people who have abandoned their integrity and disregard existing, settled law and its underlying constitutional base.
The average person can see through the sham that our courts have become/are becoming, and make right (morally AND legally) decisions better with a non-lawyer education.
Unfortunately, they cannot argue unjust, immoral positions as well as most judges do in their opinions, nor abuse the power of their office to promote their judicial activism or ignore their sworn duty to uphold the law.
I’ll take Orly’s persistence over your criticism any day...unless you can demonstrate you are doing something besides armchair quarterbacking (along with me) to obtain qualification credentials for Obama.