Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Seamus Mc Gillicuddy
Kachalsky’s denial was because he could not “demonstrate a need for self protection distinguishable from that of the general public.”

And that could pretty much be the gist of the argument.

"Your Honor, no one need demonstrate a need for self protection distinguishable from that of the general public. The general public has a powerful ally in the 2nd amendment, which tells us they have a right which cannot be infringed. Please toss this 'good cause' requirement in the trash, where it belongs."

6 posted on 07/18/2010 2:23:12 PM PDT by deoetdoctrinae (Gun-Free zones are playgrounds for felons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: deoetdoctrinae

Yep, CA has it also, but some of the Northeastern counties ,and until recently Orange county, ignore that part of the requirement.


7 posted on 07/18/2010 5:55:53 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson