[RachelFaith]

30% !!

WOW...

So my 1 outa 3 for my old Nextel was right on the money.

And 1 outa 3.... would be on the WAY WAY low end...

Hey Pug...

YOU LOSE AGAIN !!

I think he was really hoping to see some 1 in 10,000 numbers so he could have his 300% math.

Now he’s gonna need a beer or somethin’ to get over this one...

[RachelFaith]

Now where did he go....??

Just like that? POOF?

Not a very reliable troll if you ask me!!

Humph!!

[PugetSoundSoldier]

Thanks Swordmaker. So we don’t know how many were AT&T, and how many were the phone. There are basically three general cases:

If they were predominantly the network (AT&T), then the 3GS was doing pretty good, meaning the increase in drops from the iPhone 4 is significant (going from 1 per 100 to 2 per 100, still small but a doubling in the number of dropped connections, NOT an improvement from a magical antenna).

If they were equally the fault of the phone and AT&T, then you get about 15 drops per 100 from the 3GS unit, and about 16 per 100 for the iPhone 4. Both are quite bad numbers, but the iPhone 4 is only 7-8% worse than the 3GS.

If it was predominantly the phone, then the iPhone 4 is about the same, but both are incredibly bad, with about 30 per 100 calls dropped.

I don’t think your stats show the “gotcha” that Rachel thinks it does...;)