Skip to comments.
Apple faces backlash over latest iPhone
Financial Times ^
| July 13, 2010
| Joseph Menn
Posted on 07/14/2010 4:16:07 AM PDT by driftdiver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121 next last
So the censorship we see here on FR starts at the very top.
On the plus side they are selling a lot of the phones with the poorly designed antenna.
To: PugetSoundSoldier; for-q-clinton
2
posted on
07/14/2010 4:17:35 AM PDT
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: driftdiver
The damn thing is all glass. Buy a case!
3
posted on
07/14/2010 4:19:01 AM PDT
by
downwdims
(It does not take a majority to prevail... but rather an irate, tireless minority)
To: driftdiver
What censorship on FR? Is there another story here besides the one you posted? Sounds kinda big. And if “at the top” you mean Jim or John, shouldn’t you ping them out of courtesy? Please elucidate.
4
posted on
07/14/2010 4:25:03 AM PDT
by
Larry Lucido
(You can evade reality, but you cannot evade the consequences of evading reality. ~Ayn Rand)
To: Larry Lucido
“What censorship on FR? “
The macbots attempts to keep anyone who disagrees off ‘mac’ threads and to keep any information that is not mac positive off FR.
5
posted on
07/14/2010 4:32:12 AM PDT
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: driftdiver
FUD! FUD! FUD! FUD! FUD! FUD! FUD! FUD! FUD!
6
posted on
07/14/2010 4:35:10 AM PDT
by
Fresh Wind
(For the first time in half a century, there is no former KKK member in the US Senate.)
To: driftdiver
Mr. Peel and I have the original iPhone and just upgraded to the iPhone4. We absolutely love it. It is so much faster, it has a stunningly clear display. We are in a fringe area and noticed our dropped calls have significantly decreased with the new phone. Found a couple bugs (facetime)- but nothing worth a “don’t buy” rant.
7
posted on
07/14/2010 4:39:44 AM PDT
by
MrsEmmaPeel
(a government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take everything you have)
To: driftdiver
Is this a ‘Modified limited hangout’ or the standard ‘Hang out’?
8
posted on
07/14/2010 4:43:03 AM PDT
by
DUMBGRUNT
(The best is the enemy of the good!)
To: driftdiver
I never have liked MAC junk and I never will. But it is great entertainment watching the Macbots defend their church and make outlandish claims that they are ABSOLUTELY virus proof and don't even need to waste time and memory by installing a security package.
THEY JUST CAN'T be hacked. It's NOT POSSIBLE! And anyone who tries to say otherwise, or provides evidence to the contrary, ARE FOREVER DAMNED! ( / hyperventilation)
9
posted on
07/14/2010 4:44:09 AM PDT
by
PSYCHO-FREEP
( Give me Liberty, or give me an M-24A2!)
To: driftdiver
10
posted on
07/14/2010 4:44:31 AM PDT
by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: driftdiver
>>>The macbots attempts to keep anyone who disagrees off ‘mac’ threads and to keep any information that is not mac positive off FR.
Meanwhile, you sound like the NAACP talking to/about the Tea Party... < /roll eyes>
To: MrsEmmaPeel
From what I’ve read the dropped calls issue is very dependent on your location. The more cell towers you have in the immediate area the less of a problem.
12
posted on
07/14/2010 4:49:08 AM PDT
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: PSYCHO-FREEP
Of course if you make that argument then they’ll argue they have never said they are hack proof.
13
posted on
07/14/2010 4:50:27 AM PDT
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: Keith in Iowa
“Meanwhile, you sound like the NAACP talking to/about the Tea Party... < /roll eyes>”
Just another one of your personal attacks keith. Can’t stand the bright lights of reality can ya.
14
posted on
07/14/2010 4:51:19 AM PDT
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: driftdiver
You mean the silly pissing matches I’ve seen regularly between macbots and windows afficionados? I never saw that as censorship, just pissing matches. I’ve never owned a mac so I can’t really weigh in either way. But apparently no one got censored, so I guess the “top” of FR is exhonerated.
15
posted on
07/14/2010 4:54:11 AM PDT
by
Larry Lucido
(You can evade reality, but you cannot evade the consequences of evading reality. ~Ayn Rand)
To: driftdiver
Now, I’m not saying some macbots haven’t been obnoxious or smug. Some, not all, have. Just haven’t seen a whole lot of censoring going on.
16
posted on
07/14/2010 4:55:54 AM PDT
by
Larry Lucido
(You can evade reality, but you cannot evade the consequences of evading reality. ~Ayn Rand)
To: Larry Lucido
When people make the argument that only positive mac material should be allowed its censorship. When they say only certain people should be allowed to post their views on a public forum its censorship.
17
posted on
07/14/2010 4:57:38 AM PDT
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: driftdiver
18
posted on
07/14/2010 5:00:17 AM PDT
by
downwdims
(It does not take a majority to prevail... but rather an irate, tireless minority)
To: driftdiver
>>>Just another one of your personal attacks keith. Can’t stand the bright lights of reality can ya.
Says the guy who does nothing but revel in personal attack when people don’t toe his line < /roll eyes>
To: driftdiver
The macbots attempts to keep anyone who disagrees off ‘mac’ threads and to keep any information that is not mac positive off FR. You mean, like birther threads?
20
posted on
07/14/2010 5:04:35 AM PDT
by
1rudeboy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson