The reality is that in most cases where a young black man was murdered, the perpetrator was a black man.
This is true.
Does this in any way imply that a young black man unjustly accused of killing another black man in fiction is unrealistic?
No. This story reflects reality. Its also true that black men typically kill black men and white men typically kill white men.
Because black people predominantly kill other black people, no black man can reasonably be held to be innocent if charged?
Let's run that in reverse. Because white men predominantly kill other white men, no white men can reasonably be held to be innocent if charged. This argument is called reductio ad absurdum. Good for ignorant evil democrats
Is that what passes for logic in your parts?
Mere sophistry won't buy you lunch around here. Its the problem with most colleges these days. They teach rhetoric without teaching either morals or logic.
Harper Lee played the same slight of hand that Joseph Conrad did in the Heart of Darkness. Conrad was in the belgian congo in the 1880's then returned to England where in 1891 he heard about the English foray into the Benin--modern day Nigeria-- where the the Brits reported massive cases of human sacrifice. Conrad then wrote Heart of Darkness in which he imputed to Kurtz what was done in the Kingdom of Benin by the Beninese. Here look it up yourself in google under Benin human sacrifice. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_sacrifice Here's a google search of Joseph Conrad Benin Today you will read in British newspapers about nigerians turning up mutilated in London who are victims of human sacrifice. Nigerian Episcopals have broken with the English episcopal church because they know something about evil.
Educate yourself because right now you are what the communists used to call a useful idiot. You cannot serve even the people you think you are serving as you are now. Rather you injure them to death. It was quite easy to reduce your argument to the absurd, because your argument IS absurd. I also found it completely lacking in either morality or logic.
Please explain the point you are attempting to make with your reference to “The Heart of Darkness”? Because to me it seems further absurd and illogical and immoral guilt by (racial) association.
The useful idiocy I see here is you attempting to divide people by race rather than accepting the full humanity and personal and individual responsibility of all people.
Racial factions are the bread and butter of socialist kleptocracy; they have no place in a free and individualistic society.
Please educate yourself on “the Socialist roots of Antisemitism”; it is applicable to racism of all sorts.
http://www.independent.org/publications/article.asp?id=359
“Capitalism and the market economy encourage racial, ethnic, and religious tolerance, while supporting a plurality of diverse lifestyles and customs. Heavily regulated or socialist economies, in contrast, tend to breed intolerance and ethnic persecution. Socialism leads to low rates of economic growth, disputes over resource use, and concentrated political power-all conditions which encourage conflict rather than cooperation. Ethnic and religious minorities usually do poorly when political coercion is prevalent. Economic collapses—usually associated with interventionism—worsen the problem by unleashing the destructive psychological forces of envy and resentment, which feed prejudice and persecution.”