[Kleon]

And your contention cannot be proved that NO money went to Perkins & Coie that defended Obama in his eligibility cases, which is absurd on the face of it.

I never said no money was paid to Perkins & Cole. But the figure of $2 million that's being thrown around has no basis is fact.

[Red Steel]

But the figure of $2 million that's being thrown around has no basis is fact.

No basis in fact?

FEC record for payment to Perkins Coie, 2009 October quarterly report (covers July 1, 2009, to Sept. 30, 2009)

FEC record for payment to Perkins Coie, 2009 July quarterly report (covers April 1, 2009, to June 30, 2009)

FEC record for payment to Perkins Coie, 2009 July quarterly report (covers April 1, 2009, to June 30, 2009)

FEC record for payment to Perkins Coie, 2009 April quarterly report (covers Jan. 1, 2009, to March 31, 2009)

FEC record for payment to Perkins Coie, 2008 year-end report (covers Nov. 25, 2008, to Dec. 31, 2008)

FEC record for payment to Perkins Coie, 2008 post-general election report (covers Oct 16, 2008, to Nov. 24, 2008)

I suppose all this money went to Perkins Coie for Obama pom poms and candy. /sarcasm

The Obama campaign raised almost a billion dollars during his presidential campaign and not all of that was spent. All of it is funny money to Obama. What this looks like above is that Obama had a lucrative contract to pay the leftist legal firm Perkins Coie to cover all his legal issues over a period of time. Furthermore, the point made above by lorenC that Perkins Coie covered Obama's donkey-butt out of the goodness of their lefty hearts who "worked pro bono" on his eligibility cases is a ruse. Why gee, I suppose Perks & easy COIn could say that since Obama likely was paying them for unlimited use because of a super lucrative paying contract that covered everything and/or it subsidized the work because of all the funny money that Obama threw at them...for working to produce Obama pom poms and candy.