To: null and void; fnord; Number57; KevinDavis; rdb3; MNJohnnie; RightWhale; proudofthesouth; ...
Moonbat passenger jet:
2 posted on
07/08/2010 6:00:33 AM PDT by
sig226
(Bring back Jimmy Carter!!!)
To: sig226
Can’t be moonbat transport. I see an American flag on it.
3 posted on
07/08/2010 6:03:46 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: sig226
The idea of hypersonics for transportation is foolish in my opinion anyway. It just isn’t cost effective when all you’re gaining is speed of travel.
Even star trek style transporters would go largely unused if they cost several thousand dollars to go from NY to Tokyo.
4 posted on
07/08/2010 6:11:14 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: sig226
Looks cool, other than having no windows. :’) Flying across the Pacific (assuming one had the need) in a matter of a couple of hours would cost $5000 or so, unsubsidized.
8 posted on
07/08/2010 8:06:59 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
To: sig226
Interesting concept, but I cant see how it would work for take off and landing with the cg/center of pressure dynamics of the airframe.
12 posted on
07/08/2010 12:40:21 PM PDT by
valkyry1
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson