Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: daniel1212
As for codecs, as i mentioned in other posts, the legality of them is an issue with me, and i would ask if this are?

I'm pretty sure some of the codecs are legal, and some are not. It's not something I particularly worry about. Most of them can't even be purchased even if I wanted to, or gave a damn about software patents. If that concerns you, you're probably better off with proprietary operating systems.

To the best of my knowledge, there is no legal way to watch a DVD on a linux computer. Screw that.

83 posted on 07/08/2010 8:19:41 PM PDT by zeugma (Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: zeugma

Actually, because of the illegality aspect (in the US and Japan at least), Fluendo offers GStreamer codec plugins that provide native support for many proprietary media formats (costs €28 around $40). This pack gives you GStreamer plugins for the following:

* Windows Media Audio Decoder
* Windows Media Video Decoder
* Windows Media ASF Demuxer
* Windows Media MMS Networking
* MPEG2 Video Decoder
* MPEG4 Video Decoder
* MPEG2 Program Stream and Transport Stream demuxer
* MPEG4 ISO Demuxer
* MP3 Audio Decoder
* AC3 Audio Decoder

Not that i am going to buy them, as i have Windows, and Linux is something to experiment on, and the legal codec issue is one aspect that challenges it. I can use it with the multimedia handicap.

Here is couple other possibly legal options to play such. http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1177279/how_to_get_free_legal_multimedia_codecs.html?cat=15

I have also read that OpenSUSE comes with mp3 playback out of the box, due to having a contract with a company in kind of the same way as adobe has with it’s adobe flash player. The distributor pays money to a company like Fluendo, then they ship with the non-free codecs by default. At least that’s one poster’;s take.

Tthere is controversy here as to whether using a player like VLC is legal under Linux, versus encoding, which would not be

“The combination of CSS decryption software and use of formats covered by software patents places a fully-functional MPlayer in the legal bind shared by most open source multimedia players. In the past MPlayer used to include OpenDivX, a GPL-incompatible decoder library. This has since been removed, making MPlayer use only GPL-Like or BSD-like licenses. Usage of patented codecs in free software however is a still pending potential problem affecting FFmpeg, MPlayer and similar software when used in countries where software patents apply.” - Wikipedia

As for software patents, while i like and support open source and freeware, i see software patents as justified, for as some people write books for a living, others write code, and both deserve to be paid for their work just as much as a mechanic does. The problem is that because you can cheaply duplicate compiled code, so the time and labor put into it is less appreciated.

I do see the typical (and legal) limit of one archive copy of software or media as unreasonable, due to the more vulnerable condition of code.


85 posted on 07/09/2010 4:58:52 AM PDT by daniel1212 ("Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out " (Acts 3:19))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson