Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PugetSoundSoldier

Negotiations with the carrier turns out differently for different companies with different carriers. Wow, who’da thunk. The integration of Apple on the one hand via WiFi, versus downloading a third party app and clicking it for 3G ... well, whatever floats your boat. I’ll go with Apple.

One thing is pretty evident regardless, and that is that carriers do not want devices with certain native capabilities on their 4G networks at present. That will no doubt change in the future, but that future is not yet here.


5 posted on 07/03/2010 9:53:13 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: RegulatorCountry

Great, so you’d rather not have the feature available most of the time. I guess that is progress, but for most people I don’t think it is.

How hard is it to set up an app? Most people have done it at least once, and pretty much every one can sign up (you do it if you want an MSN, Yahoo, GMail, ICQ or other account).

Yes, Apple integrates a lot of stuff; at the same time, you are limited in what you can do with your phone, and what apps you can use. So if it works exactly as-is for you, great. But if you ever want anything slightly outside the walled garden Apple has given you, well, you’re stuck.


9 posted on 07/03/2010 10:00:20 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: RegulatorCountry
The integration of Apple on the one hand via WiFi, versus downloading a third party app and clicking it for 3G ... well, whatever floats your boat. I’ll go with Apple.

Yes, I think I will go with Apple too. I saw a video on the Internet yesterday. A software developer said that Apple's iPhone was the easiest mobile to develop applications for because there was one hardware platform and one operating system. The Android market was more difficult because each vender has multiple types of hardware with different versions of the operating system. And then when they do update the OS, the apps may fail.

I think Apple really has the right strategy here--vertical integration of hardware, operating system and applications.

36 posted on 07/03/2010 10:57:23 PM PDT by stripes1776 ("That if gold rust, what shall iron do?" --Chaucer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: RegulatorCountry

“One thing is pretty evident regardless, and that is that carriers do not want devices with certain native capabilities on their 4G networks at present. That will no doubt change in the future, but that future is not yet here.”

Wireless companies do not want more bandwidth hogging devices on their network. Until they can run fiber to cell phones I don’t see that changing. The more bandwidth the higher cost to provide the service.


81 posted on 07/04/2010 1:54:09 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson