Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic
"We let people use iPhones as Exchange clients via activsync or imap, but that’s external access from a public network. That’s not what I’d consider to be an example of having a Apple product “on the network”. To me, that means on the private, internal network, behind the firewall."

Agreed. And I have seen that, with both iPhones and now (per my previous post) iPads-- in the hands of one of the heaviest hitters in finance. Unix rocks.

And why not? They're supremely secure devices, as their record of imperviousness to viruses and malware has shown.
158 posted on 07/04/2010 5:56:29 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast (Obama: running for re-election in '12 or running for Mahdi now? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahdi])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]


To: RightOnTheLeftCoast
And why not? They're supremely secure devices, as their record of imperviousness to viruses and malware has shown.

They get no better treatment or consideration than any other Exchange client. If anything they're more of a PITA to set up an keep working than the Windows Mobile devices. We've got a CEO that likes his Apple gadgets too, but that doesn't translate to OSX or Linux in the data centers

161 posted on 07/04/2010 6:10:49 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson