To: RightOnTheLeftCoast
Ahh so you agree you were wrong.
“Let’s just say there’s a reason the iPhone’s competitors rapidly fall to the two-for-one or even free category a few weeks after introduction.”
You mean the competitors like RIM who actually charge more and yet sell more?
150 posted on
07/04/2010 4:53:39 PM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: driftdiver
"Ahh so you agree you were wrong."
Typical. I politely point out where you were wrong, provide you with facts and details you were unaware of, and you try to make it my problem. Artful.
The competitors I was talking about were the insecure, poorly-supported and vaguely clunky Google Android phones, of course. RIM continues its dominance, with iPhone nipping at its heels as it adds features such as Exchange-compliant hardware encryption, introduced way back with the 3GS and still lacking in any Android phone.
And hey, how about that video-chat feature for Android, eh? Scroll back up if you missed it, or search the thread for Qik. Of course, the pornophiles among the Android fandom probably wouldn't mind.
155 posted on
07/04/2010 5:10:53 PM PDT by
RightOnTheLeftCoast
(Obama: running for re-election in '12 or running for Mahdi now? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahdi])
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson