In 1961 clown, that's BS. Here are the vital record stats to classify race 50 years ago.
"Births in the United States in 1961 are classified for vital statistics into white, Negro, American Indian, Chinese, Japanese, Aleut, Eskimo, Hawaiian and Part-Hawaiian (combined), and "other nonwhite."
Being from a continent is not one of them.
Wow. If you're right (I mean, you did check that Hawaii actually used only these classifications on birth certificates, right?), this shows that there are, in fact, TWO race errors on the Certification. Because Stanley is listed as "Caucasian," and I sure as heck don't see "Caucasian" on that list of yours. Under these guidelines, Stanley Ann should clearly be listed as "White."
So why aren't you pointing that out too? Why are you only concerned with arguing that the 'correct' label for Obama's father was "Negro"?
Wow. If you're right (I mean, you did check that Hawaii actually used only these classifications on birth certificates, right?), this shows that there are, in fact, TWO race errors on the Certification. Because Stanley is listed as "Caucasian," and I sure as heck don't see "Caucasian" on that list of yours. Under these guidelines, Stanley Ann should clearly be listed as "White." So why aren't you pointing that out too? Why are you only concerned with arguing that the 'correct' label for Obama's father was "Negro"?
Wow. Caucasian being a suitable substituted for White is a far cry from "African" as a race.
"African" is not race classification no matter how you try to slice it.
Here we see Caucasian and White being described as races. Mixing the two has always been acceptable.
It doesn't matter anyways because Obama's COLB 'you think' as genuine is a forgery.