I supported it with links to show that there is constant criticism of FactCheck being a bogus (my term) source.
But, I can tell by your reaction that for some reason, that is a path that you aren’t willing to go down.
Are you afraid of paths that really point out challenges to Obama’s sources and instead just want to promote items that, for lack of a better term, live on thin ice at best?
Sorry, but you've dodged my point. I asked for very specific criticisms of factlack, not generic complaints. Where has anyone brought up factlack having a history of fraud?? This is what you said to discredit Smith, which was on a very personal level. I'm not chasing your rebuttal for you and not doing your homework for you. Do you not understand English??