I think one doesn't need a good reference to come to a conclusion that 100,000 psi is VERY suspect. Here is what I did:
To have a high pressure there must be a great weight of overburden. I convert psi to lb per cubic foot. I know that 5000 ft of column is H2O and that the remaining 13000 ft are something else. I propose a two layer model x feet of shale (because shale is a very common geologic deposit in places where people drill for oil, density 167 lb/cuft) and y feet of gold (because its density is high, 1204 lb/cuft). I then have two equations in two unknowns:
(100000 psi)*(144lb/sqft/psi)-(5000ft*62.4lb/cuft) = 1204 * x + 167 * y
and
13000ft = x + y
I solve for x and y and get:
y (thickness of shale) = 1508 ft
x (thickness of gold) = 11,492 ft
Anything less dense than gold does not have a solution. (And there is nothing on Earth more dense than gold.)
So, to believe that 100,000 psi number, one has to believe that BP drillers are so focused on finding oil that they ignored 11000 ft of strange shiny metal in the mud returns. IMHO, there is something really wrong about this model. Maybe, just maybe, 100000psi is simply wrong.
Chip -- Dig thru the doc and you'll find a pressure plot. From the log data they estimate the OBG (overburden gradient) to be around 16 - 16.3 ppg. They probably used the wire line density log to come up with a site specific OBG. You'll also notice the frac gradient is in the upper 15s. I suspect the low FG is why theyre setting csg just above the intersect: cut down the possibility of lost circulation.
ppg.http://energycommerce.house.gov/documents/20100614/BP-Production.Casing.TA.Options-Liner.Preferred.Long.Version.pdf