1 posted on
06/17/2010 1:57:51 PM PDT by
decimon
To: SunkenCiv
2 posted on
06/17/2010 1:58:31 PM PDT by
decimon
To: decimon
4 posted on
06/17/2010 2:18:15 PM PDT by
mjp
(pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, independence, limited government, capitalism})
To: decimon
Geology vs Egyptian Historical Chronology
Egyptian Historical Chronology loses again.
5 posted on
06/17/2010 2:24:59 PM PDT by
razorback-bert
(Some days it's not worth chewing through the straps.)
To: decimon
To: decimon
To: decimon; SunkenCiv
What does it mean, Gene? What the Farouk, Luke?
26 posted on
06/17/2010 6:07:31 PM PDT by
wildbill
(You're just jealous because the Voices talk only to me.)
To: bert; decimon; Hegewisch Dupa; maine-iac7; marron; mjp; razorback-bert; stefanbatory; wildbill; ...
Sorry for the intrusion, but I figured all those who posted in this topic will want to see this update:
|
While the results of Ramsey's research may present a compelling reason to revise records for the two millennia when Egypt dominated the Mediterranean world, Hawass remains categorical in his rejection of the technique: "Not even in five thousand years could carbon dating help archeology. We can use other kinds of methods like geoarcheology, which is very important, or DNA, or laser scanning, but carbon dating is useless. This science will never develop. In archeology, we consider carbon dating results imaginary." |
radiocarbon egypt site:freerepublic.com
Google
31 posted on
07/12/2010 6:03:48 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson