To: counterpunch
I have been corrected, many a time, that ALL chaps are, indeed, assless.
Otherwise, they'd be pants.
Just sayin' ;)
15 posted on
06/16/2010 1:06:03 PM PDT by
SJSAMPLE
To: SJSAMPLE
I have been corrected, many a time, that ALL chaps are, indeed, assless.
Otherwise, they'd be pants.
You have a point there.
However, it should be noted that chaps are meant to be worn over pants, not in place of them...
45 posted on
06/16/2010 2:00:10 PM PDT by
counterpunch
(Heckuva job, Barry!)
To: SJSAMPLE
Thank you. Always thought the term assless chaps to be irritatingly redundant.
68 posted on
06/16/2010 6:21:28 PM PDT by
Eagle Eye
(A blind clock finds a nut at least twice a day.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson