Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MissEdie
Don’t know about that, but does anyone know what the fraud case is about?

If I remember correctly it was that he produced more than the contracted number of prints of his paintings.

10 posted on 06/15/2010 2:48:33 AM PDT by Pontiac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Pontiac

“While not singling out [Thomas Kinkade] in its finding of fraud, the panel ruled that the Morgan Hill, Calif.-based company and one of its executives, Richard F. Barnett, “failed to disclose material information” that would have dissuaded Karen Hazlewood and Jeffrey Spinello from investing $122,000 to open the first of their two Virginia galleries in 1999.”

Gallery Owners Win Ruling in Kinkade Case
Los Angeles Times
Author: Kim Christensen
Date: Feb 24, 2006
Start Page: C.1
Section: Business; Part C; Business Desk


12 posted on 06/15/2010 3:11:51 AM PDT by Mojave (Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson