Posted on 06/14/2010 8:31:11 AM PDT by markomalley
The article in discussion makes this point, and suggests that the studies that are examined by the analysis they are refuting back this concept.
As to “100% of adopted children are wanted”, it is just as true that 100% of the pets purchased are “wanted”, at the time they are purchased, and yet millions of pets are abandoned when people grow tired of them.
You just don’t as easily abandon something that is a part of you. Sure there are cases where a biological parent doesn’t want a child, and therefore that child is better off being adopted than being with the selfish biological parent — but that doesn’t mean that child wouldn’t have been better off with a biological parent who wanted them.
I think that you have divined the essence of my meaning.
In short, yes!
You stood up to them. They’re not used to having their Master Race status challenged by “a breeder”.
Sounds like you pw3nd them.
good for you!!!!! that was a perfect response!!!! I’m not sure I would have been brave enough to say that, but now that I know you did, perhaps I can gain some courage to speak out when these people try to marginalize Christians!
You make an interesting and compelling point.
What, do they all take classes to learn mandatory phrases? I’ve come across the “If (whatever)....you’ll go to hell” crap as well. Good for you! They are the ones who look ridiculous, especially when making a point of calling attention to themselves.
Consider the source, funding and design...
As IF the outcome of this study was going to show anything but what it showed.
Strike 1: The author is Nanette Gartrell (who is “married” to Dee Mosbacher, a self-described “lesbian feminist activist”).
Strike 2: The study’s funding was underwritten by LGBT interests.
Strike 3: the study outcome is invalid due to self-selection bias of the experimental group (154 prospective lesbian mothers volunteered themselves). There is no control group (hetero couples, single straight parents, etc.
Strike 4: The methodology of the study called for THE PARENTS to rate their own children, and the children to rate THEMSELVES via an “online survey.”
It’s a farce, people. If you have respect for real science, just file this colossal waste of time under “p” for propaganda.
Excellent article. Common sense says that the study is manure, but having the reasoning and facts laid bare confirms our good senses.
Bravo! See, if normal people just have the guts to stand up to these troglodyte perverts, they usually back down. Yes, we’ve been sickeningly polite for too long, and the homo-perverts have capitalized on this character flaw of ours for all it’s worth. Without a lawyer within shouting distance, they are sniveling cowards.
One of the most disturbing aspects of injecting children into a same-sex relationship is that a main core value of the homosexual culture has always been sexual libertinism. Homosexuals are alarmingly and exponentially more sexually profligate, often openly and proudly so, than the normal world; so much so that they flaunt their licentiousness in the faces of society through their “pride” parades, street fairs, and in their night clubs. Their world is soaked in eroticism; and even though a particular homosexual may not practice promiscuity, it is a well established “value” among homosexual groups who will never tolerate dissension among their members regarding this practice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.