Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Presidential Memorandum--Disposing of Unneeded Federal Real Estate
Whitehouse.gov ^ | June 10, 2010 | n/a

Posted on 06/12/2010 1:33:17 AM PDT by Cindy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 06/12/2010 1:33:18 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cindy

I think I like this. Why keep land and buildings that are not in use. Sell them and put the proceeds towards the debt.


2 posted on 06/12/2010 1:54:47 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

I agree, on the face of it — it appears to look good.


3 posted on 06/12/2010 1:57:37 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

It will be sold on the cheap to Chicago investors who lost out on the Olympics boondoggle.


4 posted on 06/12/2010 1:58:20 AM PDT by HospiceNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

This sounds good on the surface but I bet ‘down the road’ we’ll hear cries of “we need funding for new fed buildings because of office overcrowding, blah, blah, blah...”


5 posted on 06/12/2010 2:15:54 AM PDT by libertarian27 (Ingsoc: Department of Life, Department of Liberty, Department of Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarian27

On the flip side - what a great way to get rid of asbestos and lead riddled properties - and then sic the EPA on the purchasers - win-win/sarc


6 posted on 06/12/2010 2:17:44 AM PDT by libertarian27 (Ingsoc: Department of Life, Department of Liberty, Department of Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

“leading by example as our Nation transitions to a clean energy economy.”

The horible part!!


7 posted on 06/12/2010 2:22:44 AM PDT by dalereed (in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
I very much like the fed divesting in the vast lands it owns...as much as 70% of some states! The problem here is, I was hoping they'd tie this to covering some of the unfunded liabilities related to social security...they stole our retirement money, it'd be nice if they sold the land to make good on some of our retirements. But instead, Obama is going to sell it to falsely make his economy look more solid than it is. this is a political ploy, you can be sure that Obama doesn't give a rip about the government owning too much of anything.
8 posted on 06/12/2010 2:38:39 AM PDT by highlander_UW (Education is too important to leave in the hands of the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
I think I like this. Why keep land and buildings that are not in use. Sell them and put the proceeds towards the debt.

I do not like it. The administration is selling federal land in the middle of a major recession - that means prices will be ROCK BOTTOM.

I'll bet wealthy friends and special interests will want at least certain lands, if not all of them.

This is just more wealth-redistribution by this criminal administration to hose America and give away our wealth.

9 posted on 06/12/2010 2:47:58 AM PDT by Rapscallion (Obama - The anti-American dictator disguised as a President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

There goes the last remaining piece of green space on Waikiki beach

Want to bet Ft DeRussy is sold to the Chinese


10 posted on 06/12/2010 3:02:31 AM PDT by silverleaf (Every time history repeats itself the price goes up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

That’s fine. I spend my time on the beach in Waikiki anyway. If I wanted to see green space than I would visit Kansas.


11 posted on 06/12/2010 3:29:28 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

I see all kinds of ACORN-like organizations getting prime locations cheap.


12 posted on 06/12/2010 3:47:14 AM PDT by raybbr (Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Come on... they will sell and spend and the borrow some more because dims and $$$$ are like a junky and heroin.

LLS


13 posted on 06/12/2010 3:57:39 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer ( WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

In the past the feds have leased ‘’grazing’’ rights to greenies/enviros/veggies who did not allow any grazing of beef on the land thus crowding out ranchers out west who needed the space but did want to aquire the land.


14 posted on 06/12/2010 3:58:56 AM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

With the increase in IRS and Healthcare administration what is the liklihood they will need less data center and staff space???


15 posted on 06/12/2010 4:01:48 AM PDT by Dem Guard ("Throw the trash out on November 2nd!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dem Guard

I understand what you are saying and that’s a good point.

OFF THREAD TOPIC:

Speaking of health care...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2308266/posts?page=394#394

To: All
http://www.posey.house.gov/UploadedFiles/HealthCareReformDraftRegulations-June-2010.pdf

###

NOTE The following text is a quote:

http://www.posey.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=190241

Most Americans Will Lose Their Current Health Plans According to Administration’s Regulations

Washington, Jun 11 - According to an official draft of the Administration’s regulations for implementing the new health care reform law, 51% of all Americans will lose their current health care plans over the next three years. Furthermore, 66% of all employees working for small businesses will lose their current health care plans under the regulations to establish how existing plans will meet the new mandates of the health care reform law.

“This is a bait and switch. The President and leaders in Congress made a different set of promises to the American people before their bill was passed, now the details are coming out and they don’t match the promises,” said Congressman Bill Posey (R-Rockledge). “The President promised repeatedly that people who like their current plans can keep them but now the details of their plan actually confirm what many suspected all along, most Americans will lose their current health care plan.”

A copy of the draft regulations can be viewed HERE.

Last month the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released a revised cost estimate of the new health care reform law upping the total cost by $115 billion thereby virtually eliminating the earlier estimated cost savings that was touted by the Majority when the bill passed in March. This was due to the fact that in their original cost estimate, CBO excluded many of the add-on discretionary costs.

The CBO said the administrative costs of implementing health care reform combined with various federal grants programs and mandatory Medicaid expansion will now push the overall cost of the legislation to well over $1 trillion. Addressing the bill’s $300 billion shortfall in payments to physicians under Medicare drives the real costs of the bill to nearly $1.5 trillion over the first 10 years; far above the $900 billion cost advertised the day the bill was passed. “This is why transparency in the process is so important. Congress shouldn’t pass thousands of pages of legislation affecting all Americans without allowing folks the proper time to read and analyze the proposals. This bill must be repealed.”

###

http://blogs.investors.com/capitalhill/index.php/home/35-politicsinvesting/1830-administration-51-of-companies-health-plans-wont-pass-muster

“Administration: 51% Of Companies’ Health Plans Won’t Pass Muster”
By Sean Higgins and David Hogberg
Fri., June 11, 2010 5:05 PM ET

SNIPPET: “This could pose a serious threat to President Obama’s claim that if you like your coverage, you’d get to keep it.”

###

http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/537208/201006111932/Keep-Your-Health-Plan-Under-Overhaul-Probably-Not-Govt-Analysis-Concludes.aspx

“Keep Your Health Plan Under Overhaul? Probably Not, Gov’t Analysis Concludes”
By DAVID HOGBERG AND SEAN HIGGINS, INVESTOR’S BUSINESS DAILY
Posted 06/11/2010 07:32 PM ET

SNIPPET: “Internal administration documents reveal that up to 51% of employers may have to relinquish their current health care coverage because of ObamaCare.

Small firms will be even likelier to lose existing plans.

The “midrange estimate is that 66% of small employer plans and 45% of large employer plans will relinquish their grandfathered status by the end of 2013,” according to the document.

In the worst-case scenario, 69% of employers — 80% of smaller firms — would lose that status, exposing them to far more provisions under the new health law.

The 83-page document, a joint project of the departments of Health and Human Services, Labor and the IRS, examines the effects that ObamaCare’s regulations would have on existing, or “grandfathered,” employer-based health care plans.”

394 posted on June 12, 2010 3:31:09 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse]


16 posted on 06/12/2010 4:06:49 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Rapscallion
I do not like it. The administration is selling federal land in the middle of a major recession - that means prices will be ROCK BOTTOM.

I'll bet wealthy friends and special interests will want at least certain lands, if not all of them.

BTTT.

17 posted on 06/12/2010 4:06:50 AM PDT by snowsislander (In this election year, please ask your candidates if they support repeal of the 1968 GCA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cindy
If Obama was serious he would sell government grazing land and some forests and put it back on the tax rolls instead of just consolidating workers for a few bucks in “green” savings.
18 posted on 06/12/2010 4:17:06 AM PDT by Dem Guard ("Throw the trash out on November 2nd!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

than green space is a national treasure that adds to the experince, cools things down and prevents Waikiki from being wall-to-wall concrete and burning sand

the locals may jawbone against the army but they are not going to enjoy another high rise hotel and more t shirt/sushi/shave ice kiosks

I would wager you have never spent a July or August on the sand at Waikiki without a tree


19 posted on 06/12/2010 4:27:34 AM PDT by silverleaf (Every time history repeats itself the price goes up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: HospiceNurse
It will be sold on the cheap to Chicago investors

Or to Ted Turner. Who will turn around and donate it to the UN.

20 posted on 06/12/2010 4:28:11 AM PDT by MurrietaMadman (Luke 23:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson