Skip to comments.
Myrtle Beach (S.C.) (motorcycle) helmet law quashed
The Sun News ^
| Wednesday, Jun. 09, 2010
| Lorena Anderson
Posted on 06/09/2010 7:42:00 AM PDT by martin_fierro
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Allow me to predict the flaming on this thread, so you won't have to flame each other:
- b1k3rfr33k: W00T! Victory over the Commies!
- Law'n'Order: You can ride without a helmet if you like -- just don't expect the rest of us to foot your medical bills after a riding injury turns you into a vegetable.
- b1k3rfr33k: STATIST!
- Law'n'Order: JERK!
- Admin Moderator: Knock it off.
To: Slings and Arrows; ~Kim4VRWC's~; 230FMJ; 4woodenboats; 68 grunt; absolootezer0; AdamSelene235; ...
2
posted on
06/09/2010 7:42:59 AM PDT
by
martin_fierro
(Peanut shell helmet tip to S&A)
To: martin_fierro
b1k3rfr33k: W00T! Victory over the Commies! Law'n'Order: You can ride without a helmet if you like -- just don't expect the rest of us to foot your medical bills after a riding injury turns you into a vegetable.
Ironically, both are right.
3
posted on
06/09/2010 7:45:59 AM PDT
by
Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
(We bury Democrats face down so that when they scratch, they get closer to home.)
To: martin_fierro
The S.C. Supreme Court today unanimously ruled Myrtle Beach's motorcycle helmet law is invalid because it is superseded by state law. A fact that was already known by virtually every person who had read the state law EXCEPT, apparently, the Myrtle Beach City Council.
4
posted on
06/09/2010 7:46:15 AM PDT
by
WayneS
("1984" was a WARNING, not an Instruction Manual.)
To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
I shudder to think what the Obama Health Care Barackracy is going to rule on head injuries caused by not wearing a helmet.
5
posted on
06/09/2010 7:48:57 AM PDT
by
dblshot
(Insanity - electing the same people over and over and expecting different results.)
To: martin_fierro
the city impliedly repealed the law itself when it repealed its own administrative court ordinance after the court's chief justices opined that was unconstitutional.
Don't 'ya hate it when that happens.
6
posted on
06/09/2010 7:49:17 AM PDT
by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: martin_fierro
You forgot you only need to wear a helmet if you have some brains to protect.
7
posted on
06/09/2010 7:51:28 AM PDT
by
refermech
To: martin_fierro
8
posted on
06/09/2010 7:51:35 AM PDT
by
Tijeras_Slim
(Live jubtabulously!)
To: refermech
What I forgot was to mention the annoying posts beginning with, “You forgot...”
To: martin_fierro
Ya, you did forget that didn’t you...
To: martin_fierro
Now, if we could only get the seat belt laws invalidated across the country, that would be hugh!
11
posted on
06/09/2010 8:30:27 AM PDT
by
bonnieblue4me
(You can put lipstick on a donkey (or a dimrat), but it is still an ass!)
To: martin_fierro
The law was one in a series of ordinances designed to push the May motorcycle rallies outside city limits after years of complaints from residents about traffic, noise and lewd behavior. It takes a real special kind of @sshole to live at Myrtle Beach and expect peace and quiet.
12
posted on
06/09/2010 8:30:57 AM PDT
by
Niteranger68
(We're coming for you....)
To: martin_fierro
“The law was one in a series of ordinances designed to push the May motorcycle rallies outside city limits after years of complaints from residents about traffic, noise and lewd behavior. “
Hmmmm... didn’t read anything in that sentence about bikers ‘breaking the law’ during the rallies...
Wonder why? /s
13
posted on
06/09/2010 8:40:48 AM PDT
by
Bigh4u2
(Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
To: martin_fierro
What’s with these city idiots? There’s already a simple solution to the annoyances. Simply ticket and impound every bike with open drag pipes or open race cans. That would eliminate 90% of ‘em.
14
posted on
06/09/2010 8:46:36 AM PDT
by
Seruzawa
(If you agree with the French raise your hand - If you are French raise both hands.)
To: martin_fierro
15
posted on
06/09/2010 9:37:37 AM PDT
by
blackie
(Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
To: Seruzawa
another solution. insurance companies don’t give polocies to non helmet riders and don’t pay for injuries incurred when injured without a helmet.
now the choice is fiscal responsibility vs individual freedom.
this would be a private company decision. I WOULD NOT SUPPORT the government, any government, doing this.
16
posted on
06/09/2010 10:04:56 AM PDT
by
bravo whiskey
(If the little things really bother you, maybe it's because the big things are going well.)
To: blackie
17
posted on
06/09/2010 11:16:42 AM PDT
by
spunkets
To: martin_fierro
"It's not going to change much," Mayor John Rhodes said. "We've already made it clear we don't support rallies and won't support rallies. We're very pleased that we had very few accidents and no deaths within the city this year during the rallies, and our residents were able to sleep and teachers were able to teach. If Mayor Quigly insists on treating the bikers like lawless hooligans, I say give 'em hooligans.
Playing nice and flooding the town with cash sure didn't work.
18
posted on
06/09/2010 1:44:01 PM PDT
by
4woodenboats
(Defend America peacefully, vigorously, and swiftly against all enemies before she becomes a memory)
To: bravo whiskey
another solution. insurance companies dont give polocies to non helmet riders and dont pay for injuries incurred when injured without a helmet. now the choice is fiscal responsibility vs individual freedom. this would be a private company decision. I WOULD NOT SUPPORT the government, any government, doing this.Absolutely, but why stop with motorcycles? Requiring helmets in automobiles would protect far more people. I
19
posted on
06/09/2010 2:08:45 PM PDT
by
zeugma
(Waco taught me everything I needed to know about the character of the U.S. Government.)
To: bravo whiskey
That sounds like the basic framework of a pretty sensible solution. Question though- what’s the hospital supposed to do with a no-helmet, still-alive smashed head that comes into the ER? They’ll treat him, because that’s what they do. Who’s on the hook for the tab?
I’d be surprised if many of the no-helmets crew are independently wealthy.
20
posted on
06/09/2010 3:31:48 PM PDT
by
Riley
(The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson