Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Myrtle Beach (S.C.) (motorcycle) helmet law quashed
The Sun News ^ | Wednesday, Jun. 09, 2010 | Lorena Anderson

Posted on 06/09/2010 7:42:00 AM PDT by martin_fierro

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Allow me to predict the flaming on this thread, so you won't have to flame each other:
1 posted on 06/09/2010 7:42:00 AM PDT by martin_fierro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows; ~Kim4VRWC's~; 230FMJ; 4woodenboats; 68 grunt; absolootezer0; AdamSelene235; ...
FReeper
Motorcycle
Hooligans

>> PING <<
Visit the FMH Swag Store & support FR!
Send FReepmail if you want on/off FMH list
The List of Ping Lists

2 posted on 06/09/2010 7:42:59 AM PDT by martin_fierro (Peanut shell helmet tip to S&A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
b1k3rfr33k: W00T! Victory over the Commies!

Law'n'Order: You can ride without a helmet if you like -- just don't expect the rest of us to foot your medical bills after a riding injury turns you into a vegetable.

Ironically, both are right.

3 posted on 06/09/2010 7:45:59 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (We bury Democrats face down so that when they scratch, they get closer to home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
The S.C. Supreme Court today unanimously ruled Myrtle Beach's motorcycle helmet law is invalid because it is superseded by state law.

A fact that was already known by virtually every person who had read the state law EXCEPT, apparently, the Myrtle Beach City Council.

4 posted on 06/09/2010 7:46:15 AM PDT by WayneS ("1984" was a WARNING, not an Instruction Manual.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

I shudder to think what the Obama Health Care Barackracy is going to rule on head injuries caused by not wearing a helmet.


5 posted on 06/09/2010 7:48:57 AM PDT by dblshot (Insanity - electing the same people over and over and expecting different results.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
the city impliedly repealed the law itself when it repealed its own administrative court ordinance after the court's chief justices opined that was unconstitutional.
Don't 'ya hate it when that happens.
6 posted on 06/09/2010 7:49:17 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

You forgot you only need to wear a helmet if you have some brains to protect.


7 posted on 06/09/2010 7:51:28 AM PDT by refermech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

IBTDCM


8 posted on 06/09/2010 7:51:35 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Live jubtabulously!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: refermech

What I forgot was to mention the annoying posts beginning with, “You forgot...”


9 posted on 06/09/2010 7:56:18 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Ya, you did forget that didn’t you...


10 posted on 06/09/2010 7:58:12 AM PDT by refermech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Now, if we could only get the seat belt laws invalidated across the country, that would be hugh!


11 posted on 06/09/2010 8:30:27 AM PDT by bonnieblue4me (You can put lipstick on a donkey (or a dimrat), but it is still an ass!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
The law was one in a series of ordinances designed to push the May motorcycle rallies outside city limits after years of complaints from residents about traffic, noise and lewd behavior.

It takes a real special kind of @sshole to live at Myrtle Beach and expect peace and quiet.

12 posted on 06/09/2010 8:30:57 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (We're coming for you....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

“The law was one in a series of ordinances designed to push the May motorcycle rallies outside city limits after years of complaints from residents about traffic, noise and lewd behavior. “

Hmmmm... didn’t read anything in that sentence about bikers ‘breaking the law’ during the rallies...

Wonder why? /s


13 posted on 06/09/2010 8:40:48 AM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

What’s with these city idiots? There’s already a simple solution to the annoyances. Simply ticket and impound every bike with open drag pipes or open race cans. That would eliminate 90% of ‘em.


14 posted on 06/09/2010 8:46:36 AM PDT by Seruzawa (If you agree with the French raise your hand - If you are French raise both hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Excellent!


15 posted on 06/09/2010 9:37:37 AM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

another solution. insurance companies don’t give polocies to non helmet riders and don’t pay for injuries incurred when injured without a helmet.
now the choice is fiscal responsibility vs individual freedom.
this would be a private company decision. I WOULD NOT SUPPORT the government, any government, doing this.


16 posted on 06/09/2010 10:04:56 AM PDT by bravo whiskey (If the little things really bother you, maybe it's because the big things are going well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: blackie

Ditto.


17 posted on 06/09/2010 11:16:42 AM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
"It's not going to change much," Mayor John Rhodes said. "We've already made it clear we don't support rallies and won't support rallies. We're very pleased that we had very few accidents and no deaths within the city this year during the rallies, and our residents were able to sleep and teachers were able to teach.

If Mayor Quigly insists on treating the bikers like lawless hooligans, I say give 'em hooligans.

Playing nice and flooding the town with cash sure didn't work.

18 posted on 06/09/2010 1:44:01 PM PDT by 4woodenboats (Defend America peacefully, vigorously, and swiftly against all enemies before she becomes a memory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bravo whiskey
another solution. insurance companies don’t give polocies to non helmet riders and don’t pay for injuries incurred when injured without a helmet. now the choice is fiscal responsibility vs individual freedom. this would be a private company decision. I WOULD NOT SUPPORT the government, any government, doing this.

Absolutely, but why stop with motorcycles? Requiring helmets in automobiles would protect far more people. I

19 posted on 06/09/2010 2:08:45 PM PDT by zeugma (Waco taught me everything I needed to know about the character of the U.S. Government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bravo whiskey

That sounds like the basic framework of a pretty sensible solution. Question though- what’s the hospital supposed to do with a no-helmet, still-alive smashed head that comes into the ER? They’ll treat him, because that’s what they do. Who’s on the hook for the tab?

I’d be surprised if many of the no-helmets crew are independently wealthy.


20 posted on 06/09/2010 3:31:48 PM PDT by Riley (The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson