A Sûreté du Quebéc officer stands guard at the home where a baby girl was attacked and killed by a dog in the town of St. Barnabé Sud on Monday, June 7, 2010.
Posted on 06/08/2010 1:33:53 PM PDT by JoeProBono
A Sûreté du Quebéc officer stands guard at the home where a baby girl was attacked and killed by a dog in the town of St. Barnabé Sud on Monday, June 7, 2010.
I suprised they didn’t term this as a 4th trimester abortion.....
What with it being crazy Liberal Quebec Canada and all.
How do you say “white trash” in French - garbage’ blanc?
Chet99 busy today? ; )
It’s not a pitbull attack.
Siberian Huskies
Imho, any breed of dog can be vicious.
They’re a bit like people that way...
No dog, and especially no large dog, should be left anywhere near a small child, and especially an infant, without supervision. I feel very bad for everyone in this story, but especially that child.
FWIW, “Husky-type” dogs caused the 4th most human deaths in the US, between 1979 and 1998, at least according to one study.
Pit Bull Type - 66
Rottweiler - 39
GSD - 17
Husky-type - 15
Malamute - 12
Doberman - 9
Chow Chow - 8
Great Dane - 7
Saint Bernard - 7
http://dogbitelaw.com/breeds-causing-DBRFs.pdf
If I were to own a husky, raise and train it from the age of about 8 weeks, I would guess that my dog would have a much different temperament than that of a dog raised by someone who mistreated it, might be violent toward it or might neglect it.
I saw that, but IMHO, the conclusion is not supported by the research. Clearly, a very small number of dog breeds cause nearly all the deaths. Also, the studies all show that the same breeds that cause nearly all the fatalities, are responsible for a similar percentage of serious injuries and maimings.
One fatal attack or maiming is more important than 1,000,000 minor to moderately serious bits, IMO.
The poor baby. It never had a chance.
A dog that bolts is a dog with problems.
I denfinitely agree that how the dog is raised is a major factor. That said, the vast majority of breeds are very unlikely to maim or kill, even if raised poorly. Many are pretty much physically incapable of killing and most others will not become THAT violent unless grossly abused.
On the other hand, there are a small number of breeds that stand a good chance of becoming dangerous, unless the receive outstanding care from skilled and dedicated owners.
I am for breed specific legislation that does not ban breeds, but instead seeks to keep the most dangerous breeds out of the hands of thugs, felons, and idiots and requires owners to demonstrate that they are responsible.
Some possibilities are:
*Requiring dangerous breeds to be altered, with the exception of those owned by licensed breeders.
*Requring liability insurance.
*Making breeders liable for injuries caused by dogs they breed.
*Muzzling while in public.
*Strict liability for injuries caused by breeds known to be the most dangerous.
*Requiring the dog to periodically pass a test similar to the AKC Canine Good Citizen Test. The big licensing fee could be fully or partially refunded when the dog passes.
I do trust my golden, but she could even accidentally hurt an infant. She’s a dog, she doesn’t think like a person. As you said, why take a chance? That’s why human infants have human parents. Poor poor baby.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.