Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ltc8k6

I doubt seriously there was anything incriminating about Natalee’s death, but I do not doubt there were articles and pictures about Natalee.

There could have been incriminating information about his life now. Natalee may have been the “safe” explanation, depending on who he works for.


150 posted on 06/08/2010 6:49:46 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Protect the Bill of Rights

It makes no difference what he had on his computer. If there was something incriminating there and he was worried that Stephany might tell, all he had to do was erase it or throw the damn thing into the sea. Besides, nobody can do anything with a witness or information that “I saw such and such on Joran Van Der Sloot’s computer.” No search warrant, no subpoena, nothing like that would ever be done by Aruba and Joran knows that, so he had nothing to fear from her seeing anything incriminating on his laptop because such information would go absolutely nowhere and Joran knows that. His dad taught him how the system works, he saw that even in the face of considerable evidence, Aruban judges refused to issue a search warrant for the Sloot property, and that’s just one of several hundred examples of Aruba covering up for him. Joran had NO WORRIES about anything Stephany allegedly saw.

It’s all bullshit.


172 posted on 06/09/2010 1:08:14 AM PDT by chilltherats (First, kill all the lawyers (now that they ARE the tyrants).......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson