“Yeah, I see your as accurate as your brother delusionals.”
Hey, what’s your problem, buddy? I made a legitimate, and CORRECT observation, and you stoop to personal insults?
Let me repeat, CORRECT observation:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/space/article7107207.ece
Not that I take my marching orders from anybody else, anyway, no matter how intelligent. I haven’t even expressed an opinion on this, but now I have an opinion on you...
"I made a legitimate, and CORRECT observation . . ."Oh really? You might want to revisit your own words:
"Odd that you use Hawking, considering he is fairly sympathetic to the possibility of alien visitors."In fact as my previous quotations show, he does not believe that we have been visited by aliens in UFO's, which, along with the question of Friedman's sanity, is the topic of this entire discussion, into which you injected yourself. Apparently the truth offends you.
It kind of goes with the territory.
I used to try and play nice with the naysayers.
They usually BEGAN AS NOW—WITH THE PERSONAL INSULTS—usually about IQ, SANITY etc.
I found over the years that unless they get some ‘TUDE back in their faces, their relentless absurd nastiness just escalates etc.
Dumping some of what they dish out back onto them doesn’t usually make for serenity and they usually go ape in response for a while . . . but at least they know not all of us will roll over and play dead to their obnoxious mean absurdities.
And, the fire-works do add a certain kind of energy to the threads and keep them bumped up.
The mods are no help—some of them seem to have the same attitudes as the naysayers. Sometimes I wonder if both are paid undercover government shills sabotaging FR.