Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Left in the Dust as China Unveils World's Fastest High Speed Train
Daily Tech ^ | June 7, 2010 | Jason Mick

Posted on 06/07/2010 7:45:38 AM PDT by Willie Green

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: Willie Green

Who said it was smart in the first place?


41 posted on 06/07/2010 9:02:44 AM PDT by Thurston_Howell_III (Ahoy polloi... where did you come from, a scotch ad?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

You’re right. The German train system is also an example.


42 posted on 06/07/2010 9:04:03 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Get a clue, bray: They're GUILTY.

Guilty in that they were operating a deep water drill and there was an accident. They certainly didn't do this on purpose.

43 posted on 06/07/2010 9:04:18 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

why build ONE train when you can build millions of self driving cars?


44 posted on 06/07/2010 9:05:39 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Kill anything green!!!!

If it doesn’t run on oil it ain’t worth building!


45 posted on 06/07/2010 9:11:19 AM PDT by dalereed (in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
why build ONE train when you can build millions of self driving cars?

Because in China there is ONE party that is the ONE government and ONE train makes it easier to spy on every ONE.

46 posted on 06/07/2010 9:12:46 AM PDT by stripes1776 ("That if gold rust, what shall iron do?" --Chaucer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Hi WG;)

Now that the US has abandoned the space program; perhaps mass transit will be the beneficiary of all that brain power.

There was a TV documentary recently on the crumbling of our infrastructure: highways, bridges, tunnels and power grids.

Yes, we treasure our highways and love the freedom of personal automobiles, but there is room for high speed transit. Hate to see FReepers clinging to just one option. An open mind is not an empty one.

sod;)


47 posted on 06/07/2010 9:14:33 AM PDT by sodpoodle (Despair - Man's surrender. Laughter - God's redemption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Because I don’t want traffic into Houston backed all the way up to Tulsa?


48 posted on 06/07/2010 9:14:41 AM PDT by Mr. Blonde (You ever thought about being weird for a living?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: dalereed
If it doesn’t run on oil it ain’t worth building!

That would make a great campaign slogan if you want to get thrown out of office. LOL!
49 posted on 06/07/2010 9:16:45 AM PDT by Willie Green (Klaatu barada nikto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
If it were up to me, we would pay for it with a 25% tarrif on Chinese imports.

Great, so at today's trade deficit ($226 billion), it wold take about 40 years to get the trillions needed. Boy Willie, you really want that quick!

How about if I stay here, and you stay THERE full time?

But but but - Willie, your trains! Your precious trains! You want to delay them for decades (assuming that - with the tariffs our economy doesn't completely crash and turn that financing into centuries) before you can ride them! Poor Willie, living without your trains...

50 posted on 06/07/2010 9:21:30 AM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk

Facts are so inconvenient, aren’t they? I’m just wondering if any of these train-freaks will admit they’d love to subsidize riders to the tune of thousands of dollars. Admit their desires, rather than trying to hide behind words like green and sustainable...


51 posted on 06/07/2010 9:24:11 AM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle
Hi sodpoodle!
Thank you for your thoughfful insight.
But one shouldn't be so judgemental of FReepers in general just because a few dumbed-down numnutz routinely spam and disrupt the threads that I post. There are very many thoughtful FReepers like you who enjoy my threads. They simply aren't inclined to battle the nayser trolls all the time. LOL!
52 posted on 06/07/2010 9:24:41 AM PDT by Willie Green (Klaatu barada nikto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier
Great, so at today's trade deficit ($226 billion), it wold take about 40 years to get the trillions needed. Boy Willie, you really want that quick!

That's ten years faster than the fifty year period that you were talking about.

53 posted on 06/07/2010 9:29:17 AM PDT by Willie Green (Klaatu barada nikto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

“Amtrak subsidies cost $32 per passenger.”

“That political misinformation was funded by The Pew Charitable Trust, which is basicly a tax shelter for the heirs of the Sun Oil Company.”

Really? So apparently the former Amtrak President Alex Kummant didn’t know what he was talking about when he said in 2008:
“If you actually look at the amount of public capital that flows into the rail network per passenger, it’s like $40 a passenger for Amtrak”
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSSIB27628520080612?sp=true


54 posted on 06/07/2010 9:38:14 AM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Guilt of what exactly? Were they the ones drilling the well? Was it their rig? Please be specific of their guilt, or are you just parroting the establishmedia talking points to promote your agenda?

Pray for America


55 posted on 06/07/2010 9:38:40 AM PDT by bray (No You Don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Read again, Willie - the tracks will last about 50 years before needing replacement...

But your opinion is to hold off for 40+ years (consider the time value of money, Willie - closer to 100 years if ever)? Don’t want to tax or charge fair market costs to deploy this system? Wait for a century until we can deploy?


56 posted on 06/07/2010 9:40:14 AM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
They certainly didn't do this on purpose.

No you're wrong. They did do it on purpose. BP was trying to waste hundreds of millions of barrels of valuable products. BP intended to pollute the Gulf. BP wanted to incur the wrath of the world. BP intended to rapidly shed market cap. BP wanted to lose investor value. BP thought it would be great business planning to be in litigation about this for another generation. < /sarcasm>

Seriously, the "blamers" like Obama Jr and Willie see this accident as just another "crisis" upon which an ulterior agenda can be pursued.

57 posted on 06/07/2010 10:04:29 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier

“Facts are so inconvenient, aren’t they? I’m just wondering if any of these train-freaks will admit they’d love to subsidize riders to the tune of thousands of dollars. Admit their desires, rather than trying to hide behind words like green and sustainable...”

Hey Soldier, that’s how they did it in Austin. They just finished building the thing at a cost of well over a billion dollars, and now they have about 300 riders a day. They should have just blown the money on whores and coke, at least the whores wouldn’t impede traffic.


58 posted on 06/07/2010 10:33:40 AM PDT by davetex (All my weapons got melted by a meteor!! No Sh*t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: davetex

Austin and a billion? Amateurs... Come to Seattle where we spent over $2 BILLION on a 14 mile run. We spent $180 million per mile. Most expensive in the US (actually, I think the world) by far! And we ran it right where people do NOT commute - from Downtown Seattle, through the central district (highest crime, poverty, and unemployment in the city), bypass the largest shopping mall in 20 miles, and stop a quarter mile short of the airport (it was going to stop 3 miles short).

Seattle is, as you would expect, 100% Democrat controlled. Democrat Governor, state Legislature, county executive, county council, mayor, and city council. From the White House to City Hall, it’s Democrats the whole way, and now the concern is how to overcome $50 million deficits for the next 10 years (taxes are the solution, of course).

But the supporters are quick to point out that it carries 2000 people a day! Hey, I use it occasionally, too... Free parking at the Tukwila park-and-ride, then I pay $1.75 to ride for 2 minutes to the airport. No need to pay $25 to park at the airport, or $15 at a park-and-ride near the airport, I can pay (if I choose - it’s on the honor system - the 3 times in the last 6 months I’ve used it I’ve never seen a transit cop or ticket checker) $3.50 for 4 minutes of commute for those days I fly out in the morning and back in the evening.

And I saw at least 2 dozen people do the same thing on the 7 AM train last Wednesday; the train was empty, but there were about 25 of us standing, waiting for it to arrive, all with computers and flight bags, dressed and ready to go for one-day business flights! Same thing on my return at 7:40 PM - 30 people got on at SeaTac airport, and all of us got off at Tukwila.

My guess is that at least half the daily ridership is commuters saving $20 a day by taking a 2 minute train ride (that comes every 15 minutes, by the way). So we spent $2 billion in up-front capital, and well over $7 billion by the time the bonds are paid off (in 30 years), to move 1000 people each work day. That’s $28,000 per person per year. For a train that nominally costs $2.50 each way, travels 80% of its run at grade with traffic (meaning it’s stuck in traffic as well), and even charges by the honor system.

But Willie and his train boys are all excited about it, such good returns on train investment here in the US where distances are huge, populations are spread out, and ridership is sparse. What better way to spend trillions more than to make some nice, outmoded, too slow, too expensive trains!


59 posted on 06/07/2010 11:06:39 AM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Heliand
Good thing we don't use those evil collectivist trains that permit free passage without distraint by anyone with no conditions other than payment of the fare.

AND the payment of massive tax subsidies, typically amounting to 85% of the fare.

And those taxes are paid by those who derive NO benefit from the toy trains whatsoever.

60 posted on 06/07/2010 12:19:14 PM PDT by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson